...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >An observational study of emergency department utilization among enrollees of Minnesota Health Care Programs: financial and non-financial barriers have different associations
【24h】

An observational study of emergency department utilization among enrollees of Minnesota Health Care Programs: financial and non-financial barriers have different associations

机译:对明尼苏达州医疗保健计划的参与者中急诊室使用情况的观察研究:财务和非财务壁垒有不同的关联

获取原文

摘要

Background Emergency department (ED) use is costly, and especially frequent among publicly insured populations in the US, who also disproportionately encounter financial (cost/coverage-related) and non-financial/practical barriers to care. The present study examines the distinct associations financial and non-financial barriers to care have with patterns of ED use among a publicly insured population. Methods This observational study uses linked administrative-survey data for enrollees of Minnesota Health Care Programs to examine patterns in ED use—specifically, enrollee self-report of the ED as usual source of care, and past-year count of 0, 1, or 2+ ED visits from administrative data. Main independent variables included a count of seven enrollee-reported financial concerns about healthcare costs and coverage, and a count of seven enrollee-reported non-financial, practical barriers to access (e.g., limited office hours, problems with childcare). Covariates included health, health care, and demographic measures. Results In multivariate regression models, only financial concerns were positively associated with reporting ED as usual source of care, but only non-financial barriers were significantly associated with greater ED visits. Regression-adjusted values indicated notable differences in ED visits by number of non-financial barriers: zero non-financial barriers meant an adjusted 78% chance of having zero ED visits (95% C.I.: 70.5%-85.5%), 15.9% chance of 1(95% C.I.: 10.4%-21.3%), and 6.2% chance (95% C.I.: 3.5%-8.8%) of 2+ visits, whereas having all seven non-financial barriers meant a 48.2% adjusted chance of zero visits (95% C.I.: 30.9%-65.6%), 31.8% chance of 1 visit (95% C.I.: 24.2%-39.5%), and 20% chance (95% C.I.: 8.4%-31.6%) of 2+ visits. Conclusions Financial barriers were associated with identifying the ED as one’s usual source of care but non-financial barriers were associated with actual ED visits. Outreach/literacy efforts may help reduce reliance on/perception of ED as usual source of care, whereas improved targeting/availability of covered services may help curb frequent actual visits, among publicly insured individuals.
机译:背景技术急诊科(ED)的使用成本很高,在美国的公共承保人群中尤为常见,他们在医疗(成本/承保范围相关)和非财务/实践方面的障碍也极多。本研究调查了在公共保险人群中,医疗方面的财务和非财务障碍与ED使用模式之间的不同联系。方法这项观察性研究使用明尼苏达州医疗保健计划(MMC)登记者的行政调查链接数据来检查急诊室使用的方式-具体来说,急诊室的登记人自我报告是通常的护理来源,过去一年的计数为0、1或根据管理数据进行2次以上的ED访问。主要的独立变量包括:七名报告者报告的有关医疗保健费用和承保范围的财务问题,以及七名报告者报告的非财务,实际的获取障碍(例如,有限的办公时间,育儿问题)。协变量包括健康,保健和人口统计指标。结果在多元回归模型中,只有财务上的担忧与将ED报告为常规护理来源呈正相关,而只有非财务障碍与更大的ED就诊显着相关。回归调整后的值表明,按非财务壁垒的数量,急诊就诊的差异显着:零非财务壁垒意味着零急诊就诊的经调整的机会为78%(95%CI:70.5%-85.5%),经非就诊的机会为15.9% 2次访问中有1次(95%CI:10.4%-21.3%)和6.2%机会(95%CI:3.5%-8.8%),而拥有所有七个非财务障碍意味着零访问的调整后机会为48.2% (95%CI:30.9%-65.6%),1次造访的机会为31.8%(95%CI:24.2%-39.5%)和2次以上造访的机会为20%(95%CI:8.4%-31.6%)。结论经济障碍与将急诊科确定为通常的护理来源有关,而非经济障碍与实际的急诊就诊有关。外联/扫盲工作可能有助于减少对ED作为常规护理来源的依赖/认识,而改进的针对性/覆盖服务的可用性/可用性可以帮助抑制公共保险个人中频繁的实际就诊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号