首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events
【24h】

Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events

机译:外科医生或全科医生(GP)是否应在结肠癌手术后对患者进行随访?一项针对生活质量,成本效益和严重临床事件的随机对照试验方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background All patients who undergo surgery for colon cancer are followed up according to the guidelines of the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (NGICG). These guidelines state that the aims of follow-up after surgery are to perform quality assessment, provide support and improve survival. In Norway, most of these patients are followed up in a hospital setting. We describe a multi-centre randomized controlled trial to test whether these patients can be followed up by their general practitioner (GP) without altering quality of life, cost effectiveness and/or the incidence of serious clinical events. Methods and Design Patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer with histological grade Dukes's Stage A, B or C and below 75 years of age are eligible for inclusion. They will be randomized after surgery to follow-up at the surgical outpatient clinic (control group) or follow-up by the district GP (intervention group). Both study arms comply with the national NGICG guidelines. The primary endpoints will be quality of life (QoL) (measured by the EORTC QLQ C-30 and the EQ-5D instruments), serious clinical events (SCEs), and costs. The follow-up period will be two years after surgery, and quality of life will be measured every three months. SCEs and costs will be estimated prospectively. The sample size was 170 patients. Discussion There is an ongoing debate on the best method of follow-up for patients with CRC. Due to a wide range of follow-up programmes and paucity of randomized trials, it is impossible to draw conclusions about the best combination and frequency of clinic (or family practice) visits, blood tests, endoscopic procedures and radiological examinations that maximize the clinical outcome, quality of life and costs. Most studies on follow-up of CRC patients have been performed in a hospital outpatient setting. We hypothesize that postoperative follow-up of colon cancer patients (according to national guidelines) by GPs will not have any impact on patients' quality of life. Furthermore, we hypothesize that there will be no increase in SCEs and that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will improve. Trial registration This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The trial registration number is: NCT00572143
机译:背景技术所有接受结肠癌手术的患者均按照挪威胃肠道癌小组(NGICG)的指南进行随访。这些准则指出,术后随访的目的是进行质量评估,提供支持并提高生存率。在挪威,大多数患者在医院接受随访。我们描述了一项多中心随机对照试验,以测试这些患者是否可以由其全科医生(GP)随访,而不改变生活质量,成本效益和/或严重临床事件的发生率。方法和设计接受组织学级别为Dukes's A,B或C期且年龄在75岁以下的结肠癌手术患者符合入选条件。他们将在手术后被随机分配到外科门诊(对照组)或地区GP(干预组)进行随访。两个研究小组均遵守国家NGICG指南。主要终点将是生活质量(QoL)(由EORTC QLQ C-30和EQ-5D仪器测量),严重的临床事件(SCE)和费用。随访期为手术后两年,生活质量每三个月测量一次。 SCE和成本将进行前瞻性估算。样本量为170名患者。讨论对于CRC患者的最佳随访方法,目前正在进行辩论。由于有广泛的随访方案,而且缺乏随机试验,因此无法就临床(或家庭执业)就诊,血液检查,内窥镜检查程序和放射学检查的最佳组合和频率得出结论,以使临床结果最大化,生活质量和费用。大多数对CRC患者进行随访的研究都是在医院门诊进行的。我们假设全科医生对结肠癌患者进行术后随访(根据国家指南)不会对患者的生活质量产生任何影响。此外,我们假设SCE不会增加,而增量成本效益比将会提高。试验注册该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册。试用注册号为:NCT00572143

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号