首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Towards integration of general practitioner posts and accident and emergency departments: a case study of two integrated emergency posts in the Netherlands
【24h】

Towards integration of general practitioner posts and accident and emergency departments: a case study of two integrated emergency posts in the Netherlands

机译:努力实现全科医生职位与事故和急诊部门的整合:以荷兰两个综合应急职位为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Accident and emergency (A&E) departments and general practitioner (GP) posts are often used inappropriately, leading to overcrowding. In the Netherlands, increasingly more integrated emergency posts (IEPs) are being created, integrating the care provided by GP posts and A&E departments, in order to improve the provision of the emergency care. Methods This explorative study compares the efficiency and patient and employee satisfaction in IEPs with those in two GP posts and two A&E departments. To this end, information was retrieved from hospital and GP patient records for the first quarter of the year before and of the year after the creation of IEPs. Patients and employees were sent a questionnaire to measure their satisfaction. Lastly, groups of hospital doctors, GPs, GP assistants, and nurses were interviewed. Results After the creation of IEPs, there was a shift of more than fifteen percent from secondary care to primary care for emergency consultations and waiting/consultation times were shortened by more than ten percent. Compared with the control settings, patients were more satisfied about telephone contact with an IEP, but professionals working at the IEP were less satisfied with several aspects of their work. Conclusion IEPs could be a promising innovation to organize emergency care more efficiently; however, it might take time to convince professionals of the possible advantages. Studies involving more IEPs and longer follow-up times are needed to determine whether such integration should be stimulated.
机译:背景技术事故和急诊(A&E)部门以及全科医生(GP)职位经常使用不当,导致人满为患。在荷兰,越来越多的综合性紧急哨所(IEP)正在建立,整合了GP哨所和急症室提供的护理,以改善紧急护理的提供。方法该探索性研究将IEP与两个GP职位和两个A&E部门的效率,患者和员工满意度进行了比较。为此,从IEP创建之前和之后的第一季度的第一季度的医院和GP患者记录中检索信息。向患者和员工发送了问卷以衡量他们的满意度。最后,采访了医院的医生,全科医生,全科医生助理和护士。结果建立独立专家计划后,紧急咨询从二级保健向初级保健转移了15%以上,等待/咨询时间缩短了10%以上。与对照组相比,患者对与IEP进行电话联系更为满意,但在IEP工作的专业人员对其工作的某些方面不满意。结论IEP可能是一种有前途的创新,可以更有效地组织急救服务。但是,可能需要一些时间才能使专业人员相信可能的优势。需要进行涉及更多IEP和更长随访时间的研究,以确定是否应促进这种整合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号