首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Public accountability needs to be enforced –a case study of the governance arrangements and accountability practices in a rural health district in Ghana
【24h】

Public accountability needs to be enforced –a case study of the governance arrangements and accountability practices in a rural health district in Ghana

机译:需要加强公共问责制-以加纳农村卫生区的治理安排和问责制案例研究为例

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Improving public accountability is currently high on the global agenda. At the same time, the organisation of health services in low- and middle-income countries is taking place in fragmented institutional landscapes. State and non-state actors are involved in increasingly complex governance arrangements. This often leads to coordination problems, confusion of roles and responsibilities and possibly accountability gaps. This study aimed at assessing the governance arrangements and the accountability practices of key health actors at the level of a Ghanaian health district with the aim to understand how far public accountability is achieved. Methods We adopted the case study design as it allows for in-depth analysis of the governance arrangements and accountability relations between actors, their formal policies and actual accountability practices towards the public and towards stakeholders. Data were collected at a rural health district using in-depth interviews, observation and document review. In the analysis, we used a four-step sequence: identification of the key actors and their relationships, description of the multi-level governance arrangements, identification of the actual accountability relations and practices between all actors and finally appraisal of the public accountability practices, which we define as those practices that ensure direct accountability towards the public. Results In this rural health district with few (international) non-governmental organisations and private sector providers, accountability linkages towards management and partners in health programmes were found to be strong. Direct accountability towards the public, however, was woefully underdeveloped. This study shows that in settings where there is a small number of actors involved in organising health care, and where the state actors are underfunded, the intense interaction can lead to a web of relations that favours collaboration between partners in health service delivery, but fails public accountability. Conclusions It is clear that new formal channels need to be created by all actors involved in health service delivery to address the demand of the public for accountability. If the public does not find an adequate response to its genuine concerns, distrust between communities and service users on one hand, and providers, international non-governmental organisations and District Health Management Teams on the other is likely to increase to the detriment of all parties’ interests.
机译:背景技术当前,提高公众责任感已成为全球议程的重中之重。同时,低收入和中等收入国家的卫生服务组织是在分散的机构环境中进行的。国家和非国家行为者都参与了日益复杂的治理安排。这通常会导致协调问题,角色和职责的混淆以及可能的问责制差距。这项研究旨在评估加纳卫生区一级主要卫生参与者的治理安排和问责制做法,旨在了解实现公共问责制的程度。方法我们采用了案例研究设计,因为它可以深入分析参与者之间的治理安排和问责关系,行为者的正式政策以及对公众和对利益相关者的实际问责做法。使用深入的访谈,观察和文件审查在农村卫生区收集数据。在分析中,我们采用了四个步骤:确定主要行为者及其之间的关系,描述多层次的治理安排,确定所有行为者之间的实际问责制关系和做法以及最终评估公共问责制做法,我们将其定义为确保对公众直接负责的做法。结果在这个很少有(国际)非政府组织和私营部门提供者的农村卫生区,人们发现与卫生计划中的管理人员和合作伙伴之间的责任联系很牢固。但是,对公众的直接问责制发展得很差。这项研究表明,在只有少数参与者参与组织医疗保健以及国家行为者资金不足的环境中,激烈的互动会导致建立关系网,有利于卫生服务提供方之间的合作,但失败了。公共问责制。结论显然,参与卫生服务提供的所有参与者都需要创建新的正式渠道,以解决公众对问责制的需求。如果公众未能对其真正关注的问题做出适当回应,则一方面社区和服务使用者之间会产生不信任感,另一方面,提供者,国际非政府组织和地区卫生管理团队之间的不信任感可能会加剧损害各方的利益。的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号