...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic
【24h】

Variations in risk perceptions: a qualitative study of why unnecessary urinary catheter use continues to be problematic

机译:风险认知的差异:定性研究为何不必要地使用导尿管仍会引起问题

获取原文

摘要

Background Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is one of the most commonly acquired health care associated infections within the United States. We examined the implementation of an initiative to prevent CAUTI, to better understand how health care providers’ perceptions of risk influenced their use of prevention practices and the potential impact these risk perceptions have on patient care decisions. Understanding such perceptions are critical for developing more effective approaches to ensure the successful uptake of key patient safety practices and thus safer care for hospitalized patients. Methods We conducted semi-structured phone and in-person interviews with staff from 12 hospitals. A total of 42 interviews were analyzed using open coding and a constant comparative approach. This analysis identified “risk” as a central theme and a “risk explanatory framework” was identified for its sensitizing constructs to organize and explain our findings. Results We found that multiple perceptions of risk, some non-evidence based, were used by healthcare providers to determine if use of the indwelling urethral catheter was necessary. These risks included normative work where staff deal with competing priorities and must decide which ones to attend too; loosely coupled errors where negative outcomes and the use of urinary catheters were not clearly linked; process weaknesses where risk seemed to be related to both the existing organizational processes and the new initiative being implemented and; workarounds that consisted of health care workers developing workarounds in order to bypass some of the organizational processes created to dissuade catheter use. Conclusions Hospitals that are implementing patient safety initiatives aimed at reducing indwelling urethral catheters should be aware that the risk to the patient is not the only risk of perceived importance; implementation plans should be formulated accordingly.
机译:背景技术导管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)是美国最常见的与卫生保健相关的感染之一。我们研究了预防CAUTI计划的实施情况,以更好地了解医疗保健提供者的风险观念如何影响他们对预防实践的使用以及这些风险观念对患者护理决策的潜在影响。理解这些看法对于开发更有效的方法以确保成功采用关键的患者安全实践并因此为住院患者提供更安全的护理至关重要。方法我们对12家医院的工作人员进行了半结构化的电话采访和面谈。使用开放编码和恒定比较方法对总共42个访谈进行了分析。该分析将“风险”确定为中心主题,并为其“敏锐的结构”来组织和解释我们的发现而确定了“风险解释框架”。结果我们发现,医疗保健提供者使用了多种风险感知(基于某些非证据)来确定是否需要使用留置尿道导管。这些风险包括规范性工作,工作人员必须处理相互竞争的优先事项,还必须决定参加哪些活动;阴性结果和使用导尿管没有明确联系的松散耦合错误;流程弱点,其中风险似乎与现有组织流程和正在实施的新计划有关;以及解决方案,由医护人员开发解决方案,以绕过为劝阻导管使用而创建的某些组织过程。结论实施旨在减少留置尿道导管的患者安全措施的医院应意识到,对患者的风险并不是唯一重要的风险。实施计划应据此制定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号