首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice
【24h】

Combining QOF data with the care bundle approach may provide a more meaningful measure of quality in general practice

机译:将QOF数据与护理包方法相结合可以在一般实践中提供更有意义的质量度量

获取原文
           

摘要

Background A significant minority of patients do not receive all the evidence-based care recommended for their conditions. Health care quality may be improved by reducing this observed variation. Composite measures offer a different patient-centred perspective on quality and are utilized in acute hospitals via the ‘care bundle’ concept as indicators of the reliability of specific (evidence-based) care delivery tasks and improved outcomes. A care bundle consists of a number of time-specific interventions that should be delivered to every patient every time. We aimed to apply the care bundle concept to selected QOF data to measure the quality of evidence-based care provision. Methods Care bundles and components were selected from QOF indicators according to defined criteria. Five clinical conditions were suitable for care bundles: Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), Stroke & Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Each bundle has 3-8 components. A retrospective audit was undertaken in a convenience sample of nine general medical practices in the West of Scotland. Collected data included delivery (or not) of individual bundle components to all patients included on specific disease registers. Practice level and overall compliance with bundles and components were calculated in SPSS and expressed as a percentage. Results Nine practices (64.3%) with a combined patient population of 56,948 were able to provide data in the format requested. Overall compliance with developed QOF-based care bundles (composite measures) was as follows: CHD 64.0%, range 35.0-71.9%; Stroke/TIA 74.1%, range 51.6-82.8%; CKD 69.0%, range 64.0-81.4%; and COPD 82.0%, range 47.9-95.8%; and DM 58.4%, range 50.3-65.2%. Conclusions In this small study compliance with individual QOF-based care bundle components was high, but overall (‘all or nothing’) compliance was substantially lower. Care bundles may provide a more informed measure of care quality than existing methods. However, the acceptability, feasibility and potential impact on clinical outcomes are unknown.
机译:背景技术极少数患者未接受针对其病情推荐的所有循证护理。可以通过减少这种观察到的变化来改善医疗质量。综合措施提供了不同的以患者为中心的质量观点,并通过“护理包”概念在急诊医院中使用,作为特定(基于证据)护理交付任务的可靠性和改善结果的指标。护理包由许多特定时间的干预措施组成,应该每次都对每个患者进行。我们旨在将护理包概念应用于选定的QOF数据,以衡量基于证据的护理提供的质量。方法根据定义的标准从QOF指标中选择护理包和成分。五个临床条件适合于护理组合:冠心病(CHD),中风和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA),慢性肾脏病(CKD),慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和糖尿病(DM)的二级预防。每个捆绑包包含3-8个组件。在苏格兰西部九种常规医疗实践的便利样本中进行了回顾性审核。收集的数据包括向特定疾病登记册中包括的所有患者运送(或不运送)单独的束组件。在SPSS中计算了实践水平以及对软件包和组件的总体合规性,并以百分比表示。结果9名患者(64.3%),患者总数56,948人能够按照要求的格式提供数据。已开发的基于QOF的护理包(综合措施)的总体符合性如下:CHD 64.0%,范围35.0-71.9%;卒中/ TIA为74.1%,范围为51.6-82.8%; CKD 69.0%,范围64.0-81.4%; COPD为82.0%,范围为47.9-95.8%;和DM 58.4%,范围为50.3-65.2%。结论在这项小型研究中,对单个基于QOF的护理包组件的依从性很高,但总体(“全有或全无”)的依从性则较低。与现有方法相比,护理包可以提供更优质的护理质量衡量指标。但是,对临床结果的可接受性,可行性和潜在影响尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号