...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Models of inter professional working for older people living at home: a survey and review of the local strategies of english health and social care statutory organisations
【24h】

Models of inter professional working for older people living at home: a survey and review of the local strategies of english health and social care statutory organisations

机译:在家中老年人的跨专业工作模式:对英国卫生和社会护理法定组织的本地策略的调查和评论

获取原文

摘要

Background Most services provided by health and social care organisations for older people living at home rely on interprofessional working (IPW). Although there is research investigating what supports and inhibits how professionals work together, less is known about how different service models deliver care to older people and how effectiveness is measured. The aim of this study was to describe how IPW for older people living at home is delivered, enacted and evaluated in England. Method An online survey of health and social care managers across England directly involved in providing services to older people, and a review of local strategies for older people services produced by primary care organisations and local government adult services organisations in England. Results The online survey achieved a 31% response rate and search strategies identified 50 local strategies that addressed IPW for older people living at home across health and social care organisations. IPW definitions varied, but there was an internal consistency of language informed by budgeting and organisation specific definitions of IPW. Community Services for Older People, Intermediate Care and Re-enablement (rehabilitation) Teams were the services most frequently identified as involving IPW. Other IPW services identified were problem or disease specific and reflected issues highlighted in local strategies. There was limited agreement about what interventions or strategies supported the process of IPW. Older people and their carers were not reported to be involved in the evaluation of the services they received and it was unclear how organisations and managers judged the effectiveness of IPW, particularly for services that had an open-ended commitment to the care of older people. Conclusion Health and social care organisations and their managers recognise the value and importance of IPW. There is a theoretical literature on what supports IPW and what it can achieve. The need for precision may not be so necessary for the terms used to describe IPW. However, there is a need for shared identification of both user/patient outcomes that arise from IPW and greater understanding of what kind of model of IPW achieves what kind of outcomes for older people living at home
机译:背景技术卫生和社会护理组织为在家中老年人提供的大多数服务都依赖于跨专业工作(IPW)。尽管有研究调查了哪些因素支持和阻碍了专业人员的合作,但人们对不同的服务模式如何为老年人提供护理以及如何衡量有效性知之甚少。这项研究的目的是描述如何在英格兰交付,制定和评估针对在家中老年人的IPW。方法对英格兰各地直接参与向老年人提供服务的卫生和社会护理经理进行的在线调查,并回顾了英格兰初级保健组织和地方政府成人服务组织制定的老年人服务本地策略。结果在线调查获得了31%的回应率,搜索策略确定了50个针对健康和社会护理组织中居住在家里的老年人的IPW的本地策略。 IPW的定义各不相同,但是由于预算和组织特定的IPW定义,语言之间存在内部一致性。老年人社区服务,中级护理和重新启用(康复)团队是最常被认为涉及IPW的服务。确定的其他IPW服务是针对特定问题或疾病的,并反映了本地策略中突出显示的问题。关于哪些干预措施或策略支持IPW进程的共识有限。据报道,老年人及其护理者并未参与对他们所获得服务的评估,目前尚不清楚组织和管理者如何判断IPW的有效性,特别是对于那些对老年人的照顾有开放性承诺的服务。结论卫生和社会护理组织及其经理认识到IPW的价值和重要性。关于什么支持IPW及其可以实现什么有理论文献。对于用于描述IPW的术语,可能不需要那么精确。但是,需要对IPW产生的用户/患者结局进行共同识别,并且需要更好地了解哪种IPW模型可以为在家中的老年人实现什么样的结局

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号