首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Advanced Practice Pharmacists: a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and cost of ClinicaL Pharmacist PractitionErs managing ambulatory Medicare patients in North Carolina (APPLE-NC)
【24h】

Advanced Practice Pharmacists: a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and cost of ClinicaL Pharmacist PractitionErs managing ambulatory Medicare patients in North Carolina (APPLE-NC)

机译:高级实践药剂师:对管理北卡罗来纳州门诊医疗保险患者的ClinicaL药剂师执业医师的功效和成本进行的回顾性评估(APPLE-NC)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners are advanced practicing pharmacists in North Carolina that provide disease-specific management. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the efficacy and charges from referrals to a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner by the primary care provider, to those managed by a primary care provider alone. Methods Patients were separated into cohorts depending if they had at least two appointments with a Clinical Pharmacist Practitioner from November 2008 to November 2011. A primary care provider saw all patients at least twice during the study period. Cohorts were then matched by age, gender, and disease states. Medicare billed data was evaluated from outpatient visits related to hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy, as well as emergency department visits and inpatient admissions. Cost of medications was estimated using 2009 AWP data corresponding to medication histories within the electronic medical record. Efficacy was defined as ability to reach disease state goal determined using national guidelines and reduction in pain score. Efficacy was analyzed by difference-in-differences test and all other numerical data tested by paired t -tests. Results The Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners cohort experienced more outpatient visits (1338 vs. 858, p ?0.05) than the primary care providers cohort, respectively. The Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners cohort showed changes in charges of +22.6?% for outpatient visits, ?45.5?% emergency department visits, and ?13.2?% inpatient admissions relative to the primary care provider cohort. There was no difference in average daily medication cost (Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners $38.52 vs. primary care providers $38.23, p =?0.97) or achievement of disease state goals. Conclusion APPLE-NC demonstrated that through referrals, Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners provide services comparable in charges and efficacy to primary care providers. Consequently, the current increased need for primary care practitioners can be met in part by increasing the utilization of advanced practice pharmacists for chronic disease management. Trial registration This does not apply for this retrospective cohort study.
机译:背景技术临床药剂师是北卡罗来纳州的高级执业药剂师,可提供针对疾病的管理。这项回顾性队列研究的目的是比较由初级保健提供者转诊给临床药剂师和仅由初级保健提供者管理的疗效和收费。方法从2008年11月至2011年11月,根据患者是否至少两次与临床药剂师见面,将其分为多个队列。初级保健提供者在研究期间对所有患者进行了至少两次观察。然后根据年龄,性别和疾病状况对队列进行匹配。根据与高血压,糖尿病和周围神经病变有关的门诊就诊,急诊就诊和住院治疗评估了Medicare收费数据。使用2009年AWP数据(对应于电子病历中的药物历史记录)估算了药物成本。功效定义为达到使用国家指南确定的疾病状态目标的能力和疼痛评分的降低。通过差异差检验分析功效,并通过配对t检验检验所有其他数值数据。结果临床药剂师从业者队列的门诊次数分别比初级保健提供者队列多(1338 vs. 858,p <0.05)。与初级保健提供者队列相比,临床药剂师从业者队列的门诊费用变化为+ 22.6%,急诊科门诊费用为+ 45.5%,住院病人费用为+ 13.2%。每日平均用药成本(临床药剂师执业医师为38.52美元,初级保健医师为38.23美元,p =?0.97)或疾病状态目标的实现没有差异。结论APPLE-NC证明,通过转诊,临床药师可以提供与初级保健提供者相媲美的收费和疗效服务。因此,目前对初级保健从业人员的需求增加可以部分地通过增加高级执业药师对慢性病管理的利用来满足。试验注册这不适用于该回顾性队列研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号