首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Application of propensity scores to estimate the association between government subsidy and injection use in primary health care institutions in China
【24h】

Application of propensity scores to estimate the association between government subsidy and injection use in primary health care institutions in China

机译:应用倾向得分估算中国基层医疗机构政府补贴与注射使用之间的关联

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The problem posed by therapeutic injection is a clinical practice issue that influences health care quality and patient safety. Although sufficient government subsidy was one of the 12 key interventions to promote rational drug use initiated by WHO (World Health Organization), limited information is available about the association between government subsidy and injection use in primary health care institutions. In 2009, National Essential Medicines System (NEMS) was implemented in China. The subsidy policy plays an important role in maintaining primary health care institutions. This study explores the impact of government subsidies on the injection use in primary health care institutions in China. Methods 126 primary health institutions were included in this study. Institutions were divided into two groups (intervention and control groups) according to the median GS (General subsidy per personnel). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the observed covariate differences in the characteristics of the primary institutions between the two groups. Kappa score was calculated to determine the consistency between the groups. Paired chi-square test and Relative Risk (RR) were calculated to compare the differences in injection use between the groups. Results Among all the investigated prescriptions, the overall percent of people who received an injection prescribed was 36.96% (n?=?12600). PSM showed no significant covariate difference among the 34 groups obtained through this analysis. Kappa score (k?=??0.082, p?=?0.558) indicated an inconsistency between groups and paired chi-square test revealed a significant difference (p? Conclusions The overall effect of government subsidy on the use of injection was positively significant. However, the mechanism by which government subsidy influence injection administration remains unclear, and thus requires further study.
机译:背景技术由治疗性注射剂引起的问题是影响健康护理质量和患者安全性的临床实践问题。尽管足够的政府补贴是由WHO(世界卫生组织)发起的旨在促进合理用药的12项主要干预措施之一,但有关政府补贴与初级卫生保健机构中注射使用之间的联系的信息有限。 2009年,中国实施了国家基本药物制度(NEMS)。补贴政策在维持基层医疗机构方面发挥着重要作用。本研究探讨了政府补贴对中国初级卫生保健机构注射使用的影响。方法本研究纳入了126家初级卫生机构。根据中位数GS(每人的一般补贴)将机构分为两组(干预组和对照组)。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于使两组之间主要机构的特征中观察到的协变量差异最小化。计算Kappa评分以确定组之间的一致性。计算配对的卡方检验和相对风险(RR),以比较两组之间注射使用的差异。结果在所有调查的处方中,接受注射处方的总人数为36.96%(n?=?12600)。通过该分析获得的34个组中,PSM没有显示显着的协变量差异。 Kappa评分(k?=?0.082,p?=?0.558)表示各组之间不一致,配对卡方检验显示出显着差异(p?结论)政府补贴对注射剂使用的总体影响是正向的。但是,政府补贴影响注射管理的机制尚不清楚,因此需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号