...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Distribution and trends in outpatient utilization of generic versus brand name psychopharmaceuticals during a ten-year period in Croatia
【24h】

Distribution and trends in outpatient utilization of generic versus brand name psychopharmaceuticals during a ten-year period in Croatia

机译:克罗地亚十年中非专利药和品牌药的门诊使用率分布和趋势

获取原文

摘要

Background Drug costs increasingly pose a burden upon the otherwise inadequate health care resources and rational drug utilization is an important segment of every national health policy. Optimal patient care should be the goal of rational pharmacotherapy, whereby the economic burden of treatment is just one of the elements to be considered on choosing appropriate therapy. The aim of this study was to determine distribution and trends in the outpatient utilization of generic versus brand name psychopharmaceuticals and to evaluate the rationality of prescribing psychopharmaceuticals during a ten-year period. Methods Using the World Health Organization Anatomical-Therapeutic-Chemical classification/Defined Daily Doses (ATC/DDD) methodology, the number of DDD was calculated from data collected from pharmacies on the number and size of drug packages. The ratio of generic and brand name drug costs served as an indicator on assessing the rationality of drug utilization. Results Total cost for psychopharmaceuticals increased by 20.1%, more for brand name than for generic agents (32.7% vs. 7.4%). The highest share of generic psychopharmaceuticals as compared with brand name drugs according to DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DDD/1000/day) was in the group of psycholeptics (83.6% in 2001 vs. 82.2% in 2010), most in hypnotics and sedatives, and least in antipsychotics. The share of generic psychopharmaceuticals in total drug utilization according to financial indicators decreased by 9.6% and according to DDD/1000/day by 12%. The greatest decrease was in antidepressants, i.e. by 33.8% according to financial indicators and by 46% according to DDD/1000/day; and in antipsychotics by 30.9% according to DDD/1000/day, while showing an increase by 8.5% according to financial indicators. In the therapeutic subgroup of mood stabilizers, the share of generic drugs in total drug utilization declined by 32% according to DDD/1000/day, but increased by 25.1% according to financial indicators. Conclusions The lack of uniform national guidelines and the still strong impact of pharmaceutical industry marketing continue favoring the rise in prescribing brand name antidepressants and antipsychotics. Depression, schizophrenia and bipolar diseases are complex diseases. As a result, specific measures are needed to encourage the prescribing of generic psychopharmaceuticals.
机译:背景技术药物成本越来越多地给原本就不足的卫生保健资源带来负担,合理的药物利用是每个国家卫生政策的重要组成部分。最佳的患者护理应该是合理药物治疗的目标,因此治疗的经济负担只是选择适当疗法时要考虑的要素之一。这项研究的目的是确定通用和品牌心理药物在门诊使用中的分布和趋势,并评估在十年期间开出心理药物处方的合理性。方法使用世界卫生组织的解剖,治疗,化学分类/每日定义剂量(ATC / DDD)方法,从药房收集的有关药物包装数量和大小的数据计算出DDD的数量。仿制药和商标药品成本之比可作为评估药品使用合理性的指标。结果心理药物的总成本增加了20.1%,与通用药物相比,品牌药的总成本增加了(32.7%对7.4%)。与每千名居民每天DDD(DDD / 1000 /天)的DDD相比,与品牌药相比,通用精神药物的份额最高,属于精神病治疗剂组(2001年为83.6%,而2010年为82.2%),大部分为催眠药和镇静剂,至少在抗精神病药中。根据财务指标,通用精神药物在总药物使用中的份额下降了9.6%,而根据DDD / 1000 /天,下降了12%。降幅最大的是抗抑郁药,根据财务指标,降幅为33.8%,根据DDD / 1000 /天,降幅为46%;根据DDD / 1000 /天,抗精神病药的销售量增长了30.9%,而根据财务指标,抗精神病药的销售量增长了8.5%。在情绪稳定剂的治疗亚组中,按照DDD / 1000 /天的比例,仿制药在总药物利用中的份额下降了32%,但根据财务指标却增长了25.1%。结论缺乏统一的国家指导方针以及制药行业市场营销仍然产生了巨大影响,这继续推动处方药抗抑郁药和抗精神病药处方的增加。抑郁症,精神分裂症和躁郁症是复杂的疾病。结果,需要采取特殊措施来鼓励开通用的精神药物处方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号