...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Surgery >Advanced hemostasis in axillary lymph node dissection for locally advanced breast cancer: new technology devices compared in the prevention of seroma formation
【24h】

Advanced hemostasis in axillary lymph node dissection for locally advanced breast cancer: new technology devices compared in the prevention of seroma formation

机译:局部晚期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术中的晚期止血:在预防血清肿形成方面比较了新技术

获取原文
           

摘要

Breast cancer is the most frequent neoplasm in women. Axillary lymph nodes dissection represents the treatment of choice in locally advanced breast cancer for prognostic and curative purposes. Seroma formation, an abnormal collection of fluid in the dead space of the axilla, is described in Literature with a wide range of incidence (3–85%). It is a source of significant morbidity and discomfort. The aim of the study is to compare the different haemostasis devices used in breast surgery, investigating the eventual superiority of an instrument among the others in terms of intraoperative and postoperative outcome, especially of seroma formation. Clinical cases of female patients undergone axillary lymph nodes dissection for local advanced breast cancer between January 2013 and July 2017 at the Surgery Unit of University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into four groups, according to device utilized during surgery: Electrocautery, Harmonic Scalpel, LigaSure and Thunderbeat. All patients underwent II level axillary lymph nodes dissection associated to radical mastectomy or quadrantectomy. One hundred consecutives patients were enrolled in the study. Intra-operative blood loss resulted statistically significant different (P??0,01) between the Electrocautery group (94,7?ml) and the Thunderbeat group (57,2?ml), while the Harmonic Scalpel group and the Ligasure group, despite presented a lower amount of blood loss, did not differ significantly. Drainage volume resulted significantly lower (P?=?0,002) in the comparison between the Electrocautery group and the Thunderbeat group; the Ligasure group and Harmonic Scapel group showed no difference between them and Electrocautery group. About the seroma formation, the Electrocautery group resulted affected by the highest seroma formation rate (64%). Seroma incidence in Harmonic Scalpel group was 24%, in Ligasure group was 44%, while Thunderbeat group showed the lowest presentation of seroma with 16%. In patients affected by breast cancer requiring axillary lymphnodes dissection, the use of advanced hemostasis devices is highly desirable. Among the non-traditional tools, Thunderbeat resulted to be superior in terms of reduction of intra-operative blood loss and post-operative drainage output, moreover associated to a substantial reduction of postoperative seroma incidence.
机译:乳腺癌是女性中最常见的肿瘤。腋窝淋巴结清扫术代表局部晚期乳腺癌的预后和治疗目的。血清形成是腋窝死腔中异常的积液,在文献中有广泛的报道(3-85%)。这是严重发病和不适的根源。这项研究的目的是比较乳腺癌手术中使用的不同止血装置,以研究该仪器在术中和术后结果方面,尤其是在血清肿形成方面的最终优势。回顾性研究了2013年1月至2017年7月在坎帕尼亚大学“ Luigi Vanvitelli”外科手术室就局部晚期乳腺癌进行腋窝淋巴结清扫术的女性患者的临床病例。根据手术期间使用的设备,将患者分为四组:电灼,谐波手术刀,LigaSure和Thunderbeat。所有患者均接受与根治性乳房切除术或象限切除术相关的II级腋窝淋巴结清扫术。连续一百名患者被纳入研究。术中失血在电灼组(94,7?ml)和雷电组(57,2?ml)之间产生统计学差异(P 0.01),而谐波手术刀组和Ligasure组尽管失血量较少,但差异无统计学意义。与电灼组和雷电组相比,引流量明显降低(P = 0.002)。 Ligasure组和Harmonic Sc​​apel组与电灼组无差异。关于血清肿的形成,电灼组受到最高血清肿形成率(64%)的影响。手术刀组的血清发生率为24%,Ligasure组为44%,而Thunderbeat组的血清发生率最低,为16%。在患有需要腋窝淋巴结清扫术的乳腺癌患者中,非常需要使用先进的止血装置。在非传统工具中,Thunderbeat在减少术中失血和术后引流方面表现出优异的表现,而且与术后血清肿发生率的大幅降低有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号