首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Successful collaboration in dementia care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and informal carers in Germany: results from a focus group study
【24h】

Successful collaboration in dementia care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and informal carers in Germany: results from a focus group study

机译:从德国的医疗保健专业人员和非正式护理人员的角度来看,痴呆症护理方面的成功合作:焦点小组研究的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Informal carers of persons with dementia are in contact with numerous healthcare professionals (HCP) in a complex healthcare system. Successful collaboration between the parties involved appears to be essential for good dementia care. Thus, we investigated the perceptions of both HCP and informal carers regarding successful collaboration and sought to describe obstacles and facilitators. Methods As part of the 7th framework EU project RightTimePlaceCare, five focus groups were conducted with HCP and informal carers of persons with dementia in Germany (n?=?30 participants/ time: Oct/Nov 2011). A supplementary secondary data analysis was performed, applying qualitative content analysis with open coding. Results The derived categories were sorted into three overarching themes: collaboration between HCP and informal carers, collaboration among HCP and the impact of resources and healthcare system. HCP and informal carers largely agree on what facilitates or impedes successful collaboration between them. Making the initial contact appears to be a major challenge. While HCP expect to be contacted, informal carers hesitate to seek assistance, primarily due to inner barriers. Permanent contact person/institution, well-trained, empathetic HCP who can establish a trustful relationship are regarded as facilitating collaboration. The relational perspective is more clearly emphasised by HCP than by informal carers. This may be attributed to the absence of a permanent contact person in Germany. Sufficient information relay, clear responsibilities, motivation and defined aims, and a personal relationship between professionals are mentioned as facilitators. External factors, such as rapid staff turnover, insufficient time resources and conditions specified by the health and long-term care system causing financial competition between providers, are described as general barriers to successful collaboration. Conclusions HCP and informal carers had comparable perceptions of successful collaboration among them. The initial contact seems to be particularly challenging. Better strategies are urgently needed to facilitate the access to professional support. A permanent contact person (e.g., a case manager) might improve collaboration among all the parties involved, but this is not available regularly. Constraints created by the healthcare system may considerably hinder successful collaboration.
机译:背景技术痴呆症患者的非正式护理人员在复杂的医疗保健系统中与众多医疗保健专业人员(HCP)联系。有关各方之间的成功合作对于良好的痴呆症护理至关重要。因此,我们调查了HCP和非正式护理人员对成功合作的看法,并试图描述障碍和促进者。方法作为第七个欧盟项目RightTimePlaceCare框架的一部分,在德国与HCP和痴呆症患者的非正式护理人员进行了五个焦点小组的交流(n?=?30名参与者/时间:2011年10月/ 11月)。 。使用开放式编码进行定性内容分析,进行了辅助二次数据分析。结果得出的类别分为三个总体主题:HCP和非正式护理人员之间的协作,HCP之间的协作以及资源和医疗系统的影响。 HCP和非正式护理人员在促进或阻碍他们之间成功合作的方面基本达成共识。进行初步接触似乎是一个重大挑战。虽然希望与HCP联系,但非正式护理人员主要由于内部障碍而犹豫寻求援助。可以建立信任关系的永久联系人/机构,训练有素,善解人意的HCP被视为促进合作。与非正式护工相比,HCP更清楚地强调了关系观点。这可能是由于德国没有永久联系人所致。提到了足够的信息传递,明确的责任,动机和明确的目标,以及专业人员之间的个人关系是促进者。外部因素,例如快速的人员流动,卫生和长期护理系统规定的时间资源不足和状况,导致提供商之间的财务竞争,被描述为成功合作的一般障碍。结论HCP和非正式护理人员对他们之间的成功协作具有可比的看法。最初的接触似乎特别具有挑战性。迫切需要更好的策略来促进获得专业支持。永久联系人(例如案件经理)可能会改善所有参与方之间的协作,但是这种协作无法定期进行。医疗保健系统产生的约束可能会严重阻碍成功的协作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号