首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser
【24h】

Haemoglobin A1c: comparing performance of two point of care devices with laboratory analyser

机译:血红蛋白A1c:使用实验室分析仪比较两点护理设备的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Measurement of HbA1c has been widely used for long-term monitoring and management of diabetes control. There is increasing use of point-of-care (POC) devices for measuring HbA1c where quicker results would allow immediate clinical management decisions to be made. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare the performance of such devices to the reference laboratory method. Findings A total of 274 venous blood was collected from normal healthy adults during the community screening programmes. The performance of POC devices, Afinion and Quo-test were compared to central laboratory HPLC method; Adams A1c HA 8160. Both POC devices showed good correlation to HA 8160 with r?=?0.94 (p? Conclusions Both POC devices could be considered in health clinics for diabetes management but not to be used for the diagnostic purposes.
机译:背景HbA1c的测量已广泛用于糖尿病控制的长期监测和管理。越来越多地使用即时点(POC)设备来测量HbA1c,而更快的结果可以使您立即做出临床管理决定。因此,评估此类设备的性能并将其与参考实验室方法进行比较非常重要。调查结果在社区筛查计划期间,从正常健康成年人中总共采集了274静脉血。将POC设备的性能,Afinion和Quo-test与中央实验室HPLC方法进行了比较; Adams A1c HA8160。这两个POC设备均与HA 8160显示出良好的相关性,r r = 0.94(p?)结论这两个POC设备都可以在健康诊所中用于糖尿病管理,但不能用于诊断目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号