首页> 外文期刊>BMC research notes >In silico vs in vitro analysis of primer specificity for the detection of Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae and Lactobacillus spp.
【24h】

In silico vs in vitro analysis of primer specificity for the detection of Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae and Lactobacillus spp.

机译:在计算机上与体外进行的引物特异性分析,用于检测阴道加德纳菌,阴道阿托伯钟菌和乳酸杆菌属。

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common pathology of women in reproductive age that can lead to serious health complications, and is associated with shifts in the normal microflora from predominance of Lactobacillus spp. to a proliferation of other anaerobes such as G. vaginalis and A vaginae , which can be detected by PCR. The optimal PCR pathogen detection assay relies mainly on the specificity and sensitivity of the primers used. Findings Here we demonstrate that in silico analytical testing of primer specificity is not a synonym to in vitro analytical specificity by testing a range of published and newly designed primers with both techniques for the detection of BV-associated microorganisms. Conclusions By testing primer in vitro specificity with a sufficient range of bacterial strains, we were able to design primers with higher specificity and sensitivity. Also by comparing the results obtained for the newly designed primers with other previously published primers, we confirmed that in silico analysis is not sufficient to predict in vitro specificity. As such care must be taken when choosing the primers for a detection assay.
机译:背景细菌性阴道病(BV)是育龄妇女的常见病状,可能导致严重的健康并发症,并且与乳酸杆菌属的优势导致正常菌群发生变化有关。可以通过PCR检测到其他厌氧菌如阴道G.和G.A的增殖。最佳PCR病原体检测测定法主要取决于所用引物的特异性和敏感性。结果在这里,我们通过使用两种检测BV相关微生物的技术测试一系列已发布和新设计的引物,证明了引物特异性的计算机分析测试不是体外分析特异性的同义词。结论通过用足够范围的细菌菌株测试引物的体外特异性,我们能够设计出具有更高特异性和敏感性的引物。同样,通过将新设计的引物与其他先前发表的引物获得的结果进行比较,我们证实计算机分析不足以预测体外特异性。因此,在选择用于检测分析的引物时必须小心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号