首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States
【24h】

An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States

机译:国家间非官方付款的比较:波罗的海国家卫生部门社会审计的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Cross-country comparisons of unofficial payments in the health sector are sparse. In 2002 we conducted a social audit of the health sector of the three Baltic States. Methods Some 10,320 household interviews from a stratified, last-stage-random, sample of 30 clusters per country, together with institutional reviews, produced preliminary results. Separate focus groups of service users, nurses and doctors interpreted these findings. Stakeholder workshops in each country discussed the survey and focus group results. Results Nearly one half of the respondents did not consider unofficial payments to health workers to be corruption, yet one half (Estonia 43%, Latvia 45%, Lithuania 64%) thought the level of corruption in government health services was high. Very few (Estonia 1%, Latvia 3%, Lithuania 8%) admitted to making unofficial payments in their last contact with the services. Around 14% of household members across the three countries gave gifts in their last contact with government services. Conclusion This social audit allowed comparison of perceptions, attitudes and experience regarding unofficial payments in the health services of the three Baltic States. Estonia showed least corruption. Latvia was in the middle. Lithuania evidenced the most unofficial payments, the greatest mistrust towards the system. These findings can serve as a baseline for interventions, and to compare each country's approach to health service reform in relation to unofficial payments.
机译:背景卫生部门非官方支付的跨国比较很少。 2002年,我们对波罗的海三个州的卫生部门进行了社会审计。方法对来自每个国家的30个集群的分层,最后阶段随机抽样进行的约10,320个家庭访谈以及机构审查得出了初步结果。服务使用者,护士和医生的独立焦点小组解释了这些发现。每个国家的利益相关者研讨会讨论了调查和焦点小组的结果。结果接近一半的受访者不认为向卫生工作者的非官方付款是腐败,但另一半(爱沙尼亚为43%,拉脱维亚为45%,立陶宛为64%)认为政府卫生部门的腐败程度很高。很少有人(爱沙尼亚1%,拉脱维亚3%,立陶宛8%)承认在与服务的最后联系中进行了非正式付款。在这三个国家中,大约有14%的家庭成员在最后一次接触政府服务时就送了礼物。结论通过这次社会审计,可以比较三个波罗的海国家在卫生服务中对非官方付款的看法,态度和经验。爱沙尼亚的腐败最少。拉脱维亚位于中间。立陶宛证明是最非正式的付款,对系统的最大不信任。这些调查结果可以作为干预措施的基准,并可以将每个国家针对非官方支付进行卫生服务改革的方法进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号