...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychology >Differences in motivation and adherence to a prescribed assignment after face-to-face and online psychoeducation: an experimental study
【24h】

Differences in motivation and adherence to a prescribed assignment after face-to-face and online psychoeducation: an experimental study

机译:面对面和在线心理教育后,动机和坚持指定作业的差异:一项实验研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundAdherence to treatment homework is associated with positive outcomes in behavioral psychotherapy but compliance to assignments is still often moderate. Whether adherence can be predicted by different types of motivation for the task and whether motivation plays different roles in face-to-face compared to online psychotherapy is unknown. If models of motivation, such as Self-determination theory, can be used to predict patients’ behavior, it may facilitate further research into homework promotion. The aims of this study were, therefore, to investigate whether motivation variables could predict adherence to a prescribed assignment in face-to-face and online interventions using a psychotherapy analog model. MethodsA total of 100 participants were included in this study and randomized to either a face-to-face or online intervention. Participants in both groups received a psychoeducation session and were given an assignment for the subsequent week. The main outcome measurements were self-reported motivation and adherence to the assignment. ResultsParticipant in the face-to-face condition reported significantly higher levels of motivation and showed higher levels of adherence compared to participants in the online condition. Adherence to the assignment was positively associated with intrinsic motivation and intervention credibility in the whole sample and especially in the online group. ConclusionsThis study shows that intrinsic motivation and intervention credibility are strong predictors of adherence to assignments, especially in online interventions. The results indicate that intrinsic motivation may be partly substituted with face-to-face contact with a therapist. It may also be possible to identify patients with low motivation in online interventions who are at risk of dropping out. Methods for making online interventions more intrinsically motivating without increasing external pressure are needed. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT02895308 . Retrospectively registered 30 August 2016.
机译:背景坚持治疗作业与行为心理治疗的积极结果相关,但对任务的依从性仍然中等。与在线心理治疗相比,是否可以通过任务的不同类型的动机来预测依从性,以及动机是否在面对面中扮演不同的角色。如果可以使用动机模型(例如自决理论)来预测患者的行为,则可能有助于进一步研究促进家庭作业。因此,本研究的目的是调查动机变量是否可以预测使用心理疗法类似模型进行的面对面和在线干预中对指定作业的依从性。方法:本研究共纳入100名参与者,并随机分为面对面或在线干预。两组的参与者都接受了一次心理教育,并在接下来的一周接受了分配。主要结局指标是自我报告的动机和对作业的依从性。结果与在线状态下的参与者相比,面对面状态下的参与者报告的动机明显更高,并且依从性更高。在整个样本中,尤其是在线组中,坚持分配与内在动机和干预可信度正相关。结论这项研究表明,内在动机和干预信誉是遵守任务的强有力的预测指标,尤其是在在线干预中。结果表明,内在动机可能被与治疗师的面对面接触部分取代。也有可能识别出在线干预中动机低下,有辍学风险的患者。需要在不增加外部压力的情况下使在线干预更具内在动机的方法。试用注册clinicaltrials.gov NCT02895308。追溯注册于2016年8月30日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号