...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Urology >Endovascular control of haemorrhagic urological emergencies: an observational study
【24h】

Endovascular control of haemorrhagic urological emergencies: an observational study

机译:出血性泌尿外科急诊的血管内控制:一项观察性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Transarterial embolisation (TAE) is an effective method in control of haemorrhage irrespective of the nature of urological emergency. As the technique and technology have evolved, it is now possible to perform highly selective embolisation. The aim of this study was to critically appraise feasibility and efficacy of therapeutic TAE in control of haemorrhagic urological emergencies using selective and non-selective embolisation. Specifically, we aimed to assess the impact of timing of embolisation on the requirement of blood transfusion and long-term morphological and functional follow-up of embolised organs. Methods This is a single institutional observational study carried out between March 1992 and March 2006. Records of all patients who underwent selective and non-selective angioembolisation to control bleeding in urological emergencies were reviewed. Data on success rate, periprocedural complications, timing of embolisation, requirement of blood transfusion and the long-term morphological and functional outcomes of embolised organs was recorded. Results Fourteen patients underwent endovascular control of bleeding as a result of trauma, iatrogenic injury and spontaneous perinephric haemorrhage during a period of 14 years. All these patients would have required emergency open surgery without the option of embolisation procedure. The mean time between the first presentation and embolisation was 22 hours (range 30 minutes to 60 hours). Mean pre-embolisation transfusion requirement was 6.8 units (range 0–22 units). None of the patients with successful embolisation required post-procedural blood transfusion. Permanent haemostasis was achieved in all but one patient, who required emergency nephrectomy. There were no serious procedure related post-embolisation complications. Conclusion Endovascular control using transarterial angioembolisation is an effective method for managing haematuria or haemorrhage in urological emergencies. Wherever and whenever indicated, this option should be considered early in the management of these cases.
机译:背景技术无论泌尿外科急症的性质如何,栓塞栓塞术(TAE)是控制出血的有效方法。随着技术的发展,现在可以进行高度选择性的栓塞术。这项研究的目的是使用选择性和非选择性栓塞法严格评估治疗性TAE在控制出血性泌尿外科急症中的可行性和有效性。具体而言,我们旨在评估栓塞时间对输血需求以及栓塞器官的长期形态和功能随访的影响。方法这是一项在1992年3月至2006年3月之间进行的单一机构观察性研究。回顾了所有在泌尿外科急诊中接受选择性和非选择性血管栓塞以控制出血的患者的记录。记录有关成功率,围手术期并发症,栓塞时间,输血需求以及栓塞器官的长期形态和功能结局的数据。结果14年内,有14例患者因创伤,医源性损伤和自发性会阴性大出血而接受了血管内出血控制。所有这些患者都需要进行急诊开放手术,而无需选择栓塞程序。从首次出现到栓塞之间的平均时间为22小时(范围为30分钟至60小时)。栓塞前平均输血要求为6.8单位(范围为0-22单位)。栓塞成功的患者均无需进行手术后输血。除一名需要紧急肾切除术的患者外,其余患者均实现了永久止血。没有严重的程序相关的栓塞后并发症。结论采用经动脉血管栓塞术进行血管内控制是治疗泌尿外科急诊血尿或出血的有效方法。无论何时何地,应在处理这些病例的早期考虑此选项。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号