...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: findings from an economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care

机译:针灸治疗肠易激综合症的成本效益:经济评估的结果与初级保健中一项实用的随机对照试验一起进行

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background There is insufficient evidence to determine whether acupuncture is a cost-effective treatment for irritable bowel syndrome. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care versus usual care alone for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Methods Cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. 233 patients with irritable bowel syndrome were randomly allocated to either acupuncture plus usual care, or usual care alone. Cost-effectiveness outcomes are expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) at one year after randomisation. Costs were estimated from the UK National Health Service perspective for a time horizon of one year. Cost-utility ratios were estimated based on complete case analysis for the base case analysis, where only patients with available EQ-5D and cost data were included. Sensitivity analyses comprised a multiple imputation approach for missing data and a subgroup analysis for the more severe cases of IBS. Results The base case analysis showed acupuncture to be marginally more effective than usual care (gain of 0.0035 QALYs, 95% CI: -0.00395 to 0.0465) and more expensive (incremental cost of £218 per patient (95% CI: 55.87 to 492.87) resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £62,500. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data resulted in acupuncture appearing less effective and more costly than usual care, so usual care is dominant. Subgroup analysis selecting the most severe cases of IBS (Symptom Severity Score of over 300) suggested that acupuncture may be a cost-effective treatment option for this group, with a cost-per-QALY of £6,500. Conclusions Acupuncture as an adjunct to usual care is not a cost-effective option for the whole IBS population; however it may be cost-effective for those with more severe irritable bowel syndrome. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN08827905
机译:背景技术尚无足够的证据确定针灸是否是治疗肠易激综合症的经济有效的治疗方法。这项研究的目的是评估针刺作为肠易激综合症(IBS)常规护理与常规护理的辅助的成本效益。方法与实用,多中心,随机对照试验一起进行成本-效用分析。 233名肠易激综合症患者被随机分配至针灸加常规护理或仅常规护理。成本效益结果以随机化后一年的每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本表示。从英国国家卫生服务局的角度估计费用,期限为一年。基于基本案例分析的完整案例分析,估算成本-效用比率,其中仅包括具有可用EQ-5D和成本数据的患者。敏感性分析包括针对缺失数据的多种归因方法,以及针对更严重的IBS病例的亚组分析。结果基础病例分析显示,针灸比常规护理更有效(获得0.0035 QALYs,95%CI:-0.00395至0.0465),并且价格更高(每位患者增加£ 218的费用(95%CI:55.87至492.87)。因此,成本效益比增加了约,62,500。对缺失数据进行多次插补的敏感性分析导致针灸的有效性和费用比常规护理差,因此常规护理占主导地位。亚组分析选择了IBS最严重的病例(症状严重程度得分超过300)表明针灸可能是该组的一种经济有效的治疗方法,每QALY费用为5006,500。结论结论针灸作为常规护理的辅助手段并不是该人群的一种成本有效的治疗方法。整个IBS人群;但是对于那些更严重的肠易激综合症患者而言,这可能是具有成本效益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号