...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Effectiveness of standardized nursing care plans to achieve A1C, blood pressure, and LDL-C goals among people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline: four-year follow-up study
【24h】

Effectiveness of standardized nursing care plans to achieve A1C, blood pressure, and LDL-C goals among people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline: four-year follow-up study

机译:在基线时控制不良的2型糖尿病患者中实现A1C,血压和LDL-C目标的标准化护理计划的有效性:四年随访研究

获取原文
           

摘要

No studies that have measured the role of nursing care plans in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our objectives were firstly, to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing Standardized languages in Nursing Care Plans (SNCP) for improving A1C, blood pressure and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (ABC goals) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline (A1C ≥7%, blood pressure?≥?130/80?mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol≥100?mg/dl) compared with Usual Nursing Care (UNC). Secondly, to evaluate the factors associated with these goals. A four-year prospective follow-up study among outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: We analyzed outpatients of 31 primary health centers (Madrid, Spain), with at least two A1C values (at baseline and at the end of the study) who did not meet their ABC goals at baseline. A total of 1916 had A1C ≥7% (881 UNC versus 1035 SNCP). Two thousand four hundred seventy-one had systolic blood pressure?≥?130?mmHg (1204 UNC versus 1267 SNCP). One thousand one hundred seventy had diastolic blood pressure?≥?80?mmHg (618 UNC versus 552 SNCP); and 2473 had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥100?mg/dl (1257 UNC versus 1216 SNCP). Data were collected from computerized clinical records; SNCP were identified using NANDA and NIC taxonomies. More patients cared for using SNCP achieved in blood pressure goals compared with patients who received UNC (systolic blood pressure: 29.4% versus 28.7%, p?=?0.699; diastolic blood pressure: 58.3% versus 53.2%, p?=?0.08), but the differences did not reach statistical significance. For A1C and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals, there were no significant differences between the groups. Coronary artery disease was a significant predictor of blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. In patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus, there is not enough evidence to support the use of SNCP instead of with UNC with the aim of helping patients to achieve their ABC goals. However, the use of SNCP is associated with a clear trend of a achievement of diastolic blood pressure goals.
机译:尚无任何研究评估了2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的护理计划的作用。我们的目标是首先评估在护理计划(SNCP)中实施标准化语言对基线时(2A1C≥7)控制不良的2型糖尿病患者改善A1C,血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(ABC目标)的有效性%,血压≥130/ 80mmHg,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇≥100μg/ dl)。其次,评估与这些目标相关的因素。对2型糖尿病门诊患者进行的为期四年的前瞻性随访研究:我们分析了31个主要卫生中心(西班牙马德里)的门诊患者,其中至少有两个A1C值(在基线和研究结束时)在基线时未达到其ABC目标。总共1916年的A1C≥7%(881 UNC比1035 SNCP)。 2471的收缩压≥130毫米汞柱(1204 UNC比1267 SNCP)。一百零七有舒张压≥?80?mmHg(618 UNC vs 552 SNCP);和2473的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇≥100?mg / dl(1257 UNC对1216 SNCP)。从计算机化的临床记录中收集数据; SNCP使用NANDA和NIC分类法进行了识别。与接受UNC的患者相比,有更多的在使用SNCP的患者达到了血压目标(收缩压:29.4%对28.7%,p = 0.699;舒张压:58.3%对53.2%,p = 0.08)。 ,但差异未达到统计意义。对于A1C和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标,两组之间没有显着差异。冠状动脉疾病是血压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的重要预测指标。在2型糖尿病控制不良的患者中,没有足够的证据支持使用SNCP代替UNC来帮助患者实现其ABC目标。但是,SNCP的使用与实现舒张压目标的明显趋势相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号