...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Using a hypothetical scenario to assess public preferences for colorectal surveillance following screening-detected, intermediate-risk adenomas: annual home-based stool test vs. triennial colonoscopy
【24h】

Using a hypothetical scenario to assess public preferences for colorectal surveillance following screening-detected, intermediate-risk adenomas: annual home-based stool test vs. triennial colonoscopy

机译:在筛查检测到的中度风险腺瘤后,使用假设情景评估公众对结直肠监测的偏爱:年度家庭粪便检查与三年期结肠镜检查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background To assess public preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance tests for intermediate-risk adenomas, using a hypothetical scenario. Methods Adults aged 45–54 years without CRC were identified from three General Practices in England (two in Cumbria, one in London). A postal survey was carried out during a separate study on preferences for different first-line CRC screening modalities (non- or full-laxative computed tomographic colonography, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy). Individuals were allocated at random to receive a pack containing information on one first-line test, and a paragraph describing CRC surveillance recommendations for people who are diagnosed with intermediate-risk adenomas during screening. All participants received a description of two surveillance options: annual single-sample, home-based stool testing (consistent with Faecal Immunochemical Tests; FIT) or triennial colonoscopy. Invitees were asked to imagine they had been diagnosed with intermediate-risk adenomas, and then complete a questionnaire on their surveillance preferences. Results 22.1?% (686/3,100) questionnaires were returned. 491 (15.8?%) were eligible for analysis. The majority of participants stated a surveillance preference for the stool test over colonoscopy (60.8?% vs 31.0?%; no preference: 8.1?%; no surveillance: 0.2?%). Women were more likely to prefer the stool test than men (66.7?% vs. 53.6?%; p =?.011). The primary reason for preferring the stool test was that it would be done more frequently. The main reason to prefer colonoscopy was its superiority at finding polyps. Conclusions A majority of participants stated a preference for a surveillance test resembling FIT over colonoscopy. Future research should test whether this translates to greater adherence in a real surveillance setting. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, ISRCTN85697880 , prospectively registered on 25/04/2013
机译:背景技术使用假设情景评估公众对中危腺瘤大肠癌(CRC)监测测试的偏好。方法从英格兰的三项常规(在坎布里亚郡中有两名,在伦敦中有一名)中识别出没有CRC的45-54岁的成年人。在一项针对不同的一线CRC筛查方式(非泻药或全泻药计算机断层扫描结肠镜检查,柔性乙状结肠镜检查或结肠镜检查)偏好的单独研究期间,进行了邮政调查。随机分配个体,接受一包包含一线检测信息的信息,以及一段描述筛查期间被诊断为中危腺瘤的人的CRC监测建议的段落。所有参与者均接受了两种监测选择的说明:年度单样本,家庭粪便检测(与粪便免疫化学检测一致; FIT)或三年一次结肠镜检查。邀请被邀请者以为他们被诊断出患有中危腺瘤,然后填写一份有关其监测偏好的调查表。结果返回了22.1%(686 / 3,100)的问卷。 491(15.8%)有资格进行分析。大多数参与者表示对粪便检查的监测优先于结肠镜检查(60.8%vs 31.0%;无偏好:8.1%;无监测:0.2%)。女性比男性更喜欢粪便检测(66.7%vs. 53.6%; p = 0.0111)。选择大便测试的主要原因是,它会更频繁地进行。首选结肠镜检查的主要原因是其在发现息肉方面的优势。结论大多数参与者表示比结肠镜检查更喜欢类似于FIT的监视测试。未来的研究应该测试在实际监视环境中是否可以转化为更大的依从性。试用注册国际标准随机对照试验号码注册号ISRCTN85697880,预期于2013年4月25日注册

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号