...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Role of professional networks on social media in addressing clinical questions at general practice: a cross-sectional study of general practitioners in Australia and New Zealand
【24h】

Role of professional networks on social media in addressing clinical questions at general practice: a cross-sectional study of general practitioners in Australia and New Zealand

机译:社交媒体上专业网络在解决一般实践中的临床问题中的作用:澳大利亚和新西兰全科医生的横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Clinicians frequently have questions about patient care. However, for more than half of the generated questions, answers are never pursued, and if they are, often not answered satisfactorily. We aimed to characterise the clinical questions asked and answers provided by general practitioners (GP) through posts to a popular professional social media network. In this cross-sectional study, we analysed clinical questions and answers posted between January 20th and February 10th 2018 on a popular GP-restricted (Australia, New Zealand) Facebook group. Each clinical question was categorised according to ‘background’ or ‘foreground’ question; type (e.g. treatment, diagnosis); and the clinical topic (e.g. cardiovascular). Each answer provided in response to included questions was categorised into: (i) short answer (e.g. agree/disagree); (ii) provided an explanation to justify the answer; and (iii) referred to a published relevant evidence resource. Of 1060 new posts during the study period, 204 (19%) included a clinical question. GPs most commonly asked about treatment (n?=?87; 43%) and diagnosis (n?=?59; 29%). Five major topics (23% skin, 10% psychology, 9% cardiovascular, 8% female genital, and 7% musculoskeletal) accounted for 118 (58%) questions. Each question received on average 10 (SD?=?9) answers: 42% were short; 51% provided an explanation; and only 6% referred to relevant research evidence. Only 3 answers referred to systematic reviews. In this sample of Australian and New Zealand GPs, who were members of a GP social media group, GPs asked clinical questions that can be organised into a limited number of question types and topics. This might help guide the development of GP learning programs.
机译:临床医生经常有关于患者护理的问题。但是,对于所产生问题的一半以上,从不寻求答案,如果回答了问题,则通常无法令人满意地回答。我们旨在通过发布到流行的专业社交媒体网络上来描述全科医生(GP)提出的临床问题和答案。在这项横断面研究中,我们分析了2018年1月20日至2月10日之间在GP受限(澳大利亚,新西兰)一个受欢迎的Facebook组发布的临床问答。每个临床问题均根据“背景”或“前景”问题进行分类;类型(例如治疗,诊断);和临床主题(例如心血管)。为回答所包含的问题而提供的每个答案都被分类为:(i)简短答案(例如,同意/不同意); (ii)提供解释以说明答案的合理性; (iii)提及已发布的相关证据资源。在研究期间的1060个新职位中,有204个(19%)包含临床问题。 GP最常被问到有关治疗(n?=?87; 43%)和诊断(n?=?59; 29%)的问题。五个主要主题(23%的皮肤,10%的心理,9%的心血管,8%的女性生殖器和7%的骨骼肌)占118个问题(58%)。每个问题平均收到10个(SD?=?9)答案:42%简短; 51%提供了解释;只有6%提到了相关的研究证据。只有3个答案涉及系统评价。在作为GP社交媒体小组成员的澳大利亚和新西兰GP的样本中,GP提出了一些临床问题,这些问题可以组织成数量有限的问题类型和主题。这可能有助于指导GP学习程序的开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号