首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Activating GENeral practitioners dialogue with patients on their Agenda (MultiCare AGENDA) study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Activating GENeral practitioners dialogue with patients on their Agenda (MultiCare AGENDA) study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

机译:激活一般医生与他们的议程(MultiCare AGENDA)研究方案的患者进行对话,以进行一项随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background This study investigates the efficacy of a complex multifaceted intervention aiming at increasing the quality of care of GPs for patients with multimorbidity. In its core, the intervention aims at enhancing the doctor-patient-dialogue and identifying the patient’s agenda and needs. Also, a medication check is embedded. Our primary hypothesis is that a more patient-centred communication will reduce the number of active pharmaceuticals taken without impairing the patients’ quality of life. Secondary hypotheses include a better knowledge of GPs about their patients’ medication, a higher patient satisfaction and a more effective and/or efficient health care utilization. Methods/design Multi-center, parallel group, cluster randomized controlled clinical trial in GP surgeries. Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 65–84 years with at least 3 chronic conditions. Intervention: GPs allocated to this group will receive a multifaceted educational intervention on performing a narrative doctor-patient dialogue reflecting treatment targets and priorities of the patient and on performing a narrative patient-centred medication review. During the one year intervention GPs will have a total of three conversations à 30 minutes with the enrolled patients. Control: Care as usual. Follow-up per patient: 14 months after baseline interview. Primary efficacy endpoints: Differences in medication intake and health related quality of life between baseline and follow-up in the intervention compared to the control group. Randomization: Computer-generated by an independent institute. It will be performed successively when patient recruitment in the respective surgery is finished. Blinding: Participants (GPs and patients) will not be blinded to their assignment but will be unaware of the study hypotheses or outcome measures. Discussion There is growing evidence that the phenomenon of polypharmacy and low quality of drug use is substantially due to mis-communication (or non-communication) in the doctor patient interaction. We assume that the number of pharmaceutical agents taken can be reduced by a communicational intervention and that this will not impair the patients’ health-related quality of life. Improving communication is a core issue of future interventions, especially for patients with multimorbidity. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN46272088.
机译:背景技术这项研究调查了旨在提高全科医生对多病患者的护理质量的复杂多方面干预措施的功效。干预的核心是加强医患对话,并确定患者的日程和需求。另外,还嵌入了药物检查。我们的主要假设是,以患者为中心的交流将减少服用的活性药物的数量,而不会损害患者的生活质量。次要假设包括对全科医生的有关患者药物的了解,较高的患者满意度以及更有效和/或更有效的医疗保健利用。方法/设计GP手术中的多中心,平行分组,集群随机对照临床试验。纳入标准:65-84岁的患者至少患有3种慢性疾病。干预:分配给该小组的全科医生将接受多方面的教育干预,以进行叙述性的医患对话,以反映患者的治疗目标和重点,并进行以患者为中心的叙述性药物审查。在为期一年的干预中,全科医生将与入组患者进行总共三场对话(30分钟)。控制:照常护理。每位患者的随访:基线访谈后14个月。主要功效终点:与对照组相比,干预措施的基线和随访之间药物摄入量和健康相关生活质量的差异。随机化:由独立机构计算机生成。当各个手术中的患者招募完成时,将连续执行该操作。致盲:参与者(GP和患者)不会被盲目分配,但不会知道研究假设或结果指标。讨论越来越多的证据表明,多药现象和药物使用质量低下主要是由于医患互动中的沟通不畅(或不沟通)。我们假设通过交流干预可以减少服用的药剂的数量,并且这不会损害患者健康相关的生活质量。改善沟通是未来干预的核心问题,尤其是对于多发病的患者。试用注册电流对照试验ISRCTN46272088。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号