...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Evolutionary Biology >Carriers of mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup R colonized Eurasia and Australasia from a southeast Asia core area
【24h】

Carriers of mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup R colonized Eurasia and Australasia from a southeast Asia core area

机译:线粒体DNA大单体群R的携带者在东南亚核心地区定居于欧亚大陆和大洋洲

获取原文

摘要

The colonization of Eurasia and Australasia by African modern humans has been explained, nearly unanimously, as the result of a quick southern coastal dispersal route through the Arabian Peninsula, the Indian subcontinent, and the Indochinese Peninsula, to reach Australia around 50 kya. The phylogeny and phylogeography of the major mitochondrial DNA Eurasian haplogroups M and N have played the main role in giving molecular genetics support to that scenario. However, using the same molecular tools, a northern route across central Asia has been invoked as an alternative that is more conciliatory with the fossil record of East Asia. Here, we assess as the Eurasian macrohaplogroup R fits in the northern path. Haplogroup U, with a founder age around 50 kya, is one of the oldest clades of macrohaplogroup R in western Asia. The main branches of U expanded in successive waves across West, Central and South Asia before the Last Glacial Maximum. All these dispersions had rather overlapping ranges. Some of them, as those of U6 and U3, reached North Africa. At the other end of Asia, in Wallacea, another branch of macrohaplogroup R, haplogroup P, also independently expanded in the area around 52 kya, in this case as isolated bursts geographically well structured, with autochthonous branches in Australia, New Guinea, and the Philippines. Coeval independently dispersals around 50 kya of the West Asia haplogroup U and the Wallacea haplogroup P, points to a halfway core area in southeast Asia as the most probable centre of expansion of macrohaplogroup R, what fits in the phylogeographic pattern of its ancestor, macrohaplogroup N, for which a northern route and a southeast Asian origin has been already proposed.
机译:几乎一致地解释了非洲现代人对欧亚大陆和大洋洲的殖民化,这是由于南部沿海迅速通过阿拉伯半岛,印度次大陆和印度支那半岛到达了澳大利亚(约50公里)。主要的线粒体DNA欧亚单倍体M和N的系统发育和系统地理学在为这种情况提供分子遗传学支持方面发挥了主要作用。但是,使用相同的分子工具,已将横跨中亚的北部路线作为替代方案,与东亚的化石记录更为和解。在这里,我们评估欧亚大单体组R是否适合北路径。 Haplogroup U的创建者年龄大约为50 kya,它是西亚Macrohaplogroup R最古老的进化枝之一。在最后一次冰川最大爆发之前,U的主要分支在西亚,中亚和南亚连续波中扩展。所有这些分散都具有相当重叠的范围。其中一些武器,如U6和U3武器,已到达北非。在亚洲的另一端,在华莱士,大型单倍群R的另一个分支单倍群P也独立地在52 kya左右的区域扩展,在这种情况下,由于孤立的爆发地理结构良好,在澳大利亚,新几内亚和菲律宾。 Coeval独立地散布了大约50 kya的亚洲单倍群U和Wallacea单倍群P,指向东南亚的一个中途核心区域,这是其最可能扩展的宏观单倍群R的中心,这与其祖先Macrohaplogroup N的系统地理学模式相吻合。 ,已经提出了北部路线和东南亚起源的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号