...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Acceptability and effectiveness of opportunistic referral of smokers to telephone cessation advice from a nurse: a randomised trial in Australian general practice
【24h】

Acceptability and effectiveness of opportunistic referral of smokers to telephone cessation advice from a nurse: a randomised trial in Australian general practice

机译:吸烟者机会性转介护士的电话戒断建议的可接受性和有效性:澳大利亚一般实践中的一项随机试验

获取原文

摘要

Background GPs often lack time to provide intensive cessation advice for patients who smoke. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of opportunistic referral of smokers by their GP for telephone cessation counselling by a trained nurse. Methods Adult smokers (n = 318) attending 30 GPs in South Western Sydney, Australia were randomly allocated to usual care or referral to a telephone-based program comprising assessment and stage-based behavioural advice, written information and follow-up delivered by a nurse. Self-reported point prevalence abstinence at six and 12 months was compared between groups. Characteristics of patients who accepted and completed the intervention were investigated. Results Of 169 smokers randomised to the intervention, 76 (45%) consented to referral. Compared with smokers in 'pre-contemplation', those further along the stage-of-change continuum were significantly more likely to consent (p = 0.003). Those further along the continuum also were significantly more likely to complete all four calls of the intervention (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 0.8–8.1 and OR 8.6, 95% CI: 1.7–44.4 for 'contemplation' and 'preparation' respectively). At six months, there was no significant difference between groups in point prevalence abstinence (intention to treat) (9% versus 8%, p = 0.7). There was no evidence of differential intervention effectiveness by baseline stage-of-change (p = 0.6) or patient sex (p = 0.5). At 12 months, point prevalence abstinence in the intervention and control groups was 8% and 6% respectively (p = 0.6). Conclusion Acceptance of opportunistic referral for nurse delivered telephone cessation advice was low. This trial did not demonstrate improved quit rates following the intervention. Future research efforts might better focus support for those patients who are motivated to quit. Australian Clinical Trials Registry number ACTRN012607000091404
机译:背景全科医生通常缺乏时间为吸烟患者提供强化戒烟建议。这项研究的目的是确定由训练有素的护士进行全科医生电话戒烟咨询的全科医生转介吸烟者的有效性。方法将在澳大利亚西南悉尼参加30次全科医生的成年吸烟者(n = 318)随机分配到常规护理或转诊到电话计划,该计划包括评估和基于阶段的行为建议,书面信息以及护士进行的随访。比较两组之间在6个月和12个月时自我报告的点患病率。研究接受和完成干预的患者的特征。结果在169名随机接受干预的吸烟者中,有76名(45%)同意转诊。与处于“预先考虑”阶段的吸烟者相比,处于变化阶段连续阶段的吸烟者的同意可能性更高(p = 0.003)。那些连续的人也更有可能完成所有四个干预措施(对于“沉思”和“准备”分别为OR 2.6,95%CI:0.8-8.1和OR 8.6,95%CI:1.7-44.4) 。六个月时,两组的点流行率戒断(治疗意图)无显着差异(9%比8%,p = 0.7)。没有证据显示基线变化阶段(p = 0.6)或患者性别(p = 0.5)对干预效果有差异。在12个月时,干预组和对照组的点流行率分别为8%和6%(p = 0.6)。结论护士提供电话中止建议的机会转诊率较低。该试验未显示干预后戒烟率提高。未来的研究工作可能会更好地将支持重点放在那些有动力退出的患者身上。澳大利亚临床试验注册号ACTRN012607000091404

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号