...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Endocrine Disorders >Distinction of cardiometabolic profiles among people ≥75?years with type 2 diabetes: a latent profile analysis
【24h】

Distinction of cardiometabolic profiles among people ≥75?years with type 2 diabetes: a latent profile analysis

机译:≥75岁的2型糖尿病患者的心脏代谢特征的区分:潜在特征分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus represent a heterogeneous group in terms of metabolic profile. It makes glucose-lowering-therapy (GLT) complex to manage, as it needs to be individualised according to the patient profile. This study aimed to identify and characterize subgroups existing among older patients with diabetes. Retrospective observational cohort study of outpatients followed in a Belgian diabetes clinic. Included participants were all aged ≥75?years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, Caucasian, and had a Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2). A latent profile analysis was conducted to classify patients using the age at diabetes diagnosis and HOMA2 variables, i.e. insulin sensitivity (HOMA2%-S), beta-cell-function (HOMA2%-β), and the product between both (HOMA2%-βxS; as a measure of residual beta-cell function). GLT was expressed in defined daily dose (DDD). In total, 147 patients were included (median age: 80?years; 37.4% women; median age at diabetes diagnostic: 62?years). The resulting model classified patients into 6 distinct cardiometabolic profiles. Patients in profiles?1 and 2 had an older age at diabetes diagnosis (median: 68?years) and a lesser decrease in HOMA2%-S, as compared to other profiles. They also presented with the highest HOMA2%-βxS values. Patients in profiles?3, 4 and 5 had a moderate decrease in HOMA2%-βxS. Patients in profile?6 had the largest decrease in HOMA2%-β and HOMA2%-βxS. This classification was associated with significant differences in terms of HbA1c values and GLT total DDD between profiles. Thus, patients in profiles?1 and 2 presented with the lowest HbA1c values (median: 6.5%) though they received the lightest GLT (median GLT DDD: 0.75). Patients in profiles?3 to 5 presented with intermediate values of HbA1c (median: 7.3% and GLT DDD (median: 1.31). Finally, patients in profile?6 had the highest HbA1c values (median: 8.4%) despite receiving the highest GLT DDD (median: 2.28). Other metabolic differences were found between profiles. This study identified 6 groups among patients ≥75?years with type 2 diabetes by latent profile analysis, based on age at diabetes diagnosis, insulin sensitivity, absolute and residual β-cell function. Intensity and choice of GLT should be adapted on this basis in addition to other existing recommendations for treatment individualisation.
机译:就代谢谱而言,患有2型糖尿病的老年患者代表异质性人群。由于需要根据患者情况进行个性化设置,因此降低血糖治疗(GLT)的管理难度。这项研究旨在确定和表征老年糖尿病患者中存在的亚组。在比利时糖尿病诊所对门诊病人进行回顾性观察队列研究。参加者均为年龄≥75岁,诊断为2型糖尿病,高加索人,并接受过稳态模型评估(HOMA2)。进行了潜伏性分析,使用糖尿病诊断时的年龄和HOMA2变量(即胰岛素敏感性(HOMA2%-S),β细胞功能(HOMA2%-β)和两者之间的乘积(HOMA2%- βxS;作为残留β细胞功能的量度)。 GLT以规定的每日剂量(DDD)表示。总共包括147名患者(中位年龄:80岁;女性37.4%;糖尿病诊断中位年龄:62岁)。所得模型将患者分为6种不同的心脏代谢曲线。与其他特征相比,特征1和特征2的患者在诊断出糖尿病时年龄更大(中位数为68岁),而HOMA2%-S的下降幅度较小。他们还表现出最高的HOMA2%-βxS值。 3、4和5型患者的HOMA2%-βxS轻度降低。在profile?6中的患者的HOMA2%-β和HOMA2%-βxS下降幅度最大。此分类与配置文件之间的HbA1c值和GLT总DDD的显着差异相关。因此,概况1和2的患者尽管接受了最轻的GLT(中位数GLT DDD:0.75),但HbA1c值最低(中位数:6.5%)。 3〜5型患者的HbA1c中间值(中位数:7.3%)和GLT DDD(中位数:1.31);最后,6型患者的HbA1c值最高(中位数:8.4%),尽管GLT最高DDD(中位数:2.28)。分布之间还存在其他代谢差异。本研究通过隐性分布分析根据糖尿病诊断时的年龄,胰岛素敏感性,绝对β-和残留β-和β-分布确定了≥75岁的2型糖尿病患者中的6组。除了其他现有的治疗个体化建议外,还应在此基础上调整GLT的强度和选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号