...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Evolutionary Biology >The temporal window of ecological adaptation in postglacial lakes: a comparison of head morphology, trophic position and habitat use in Norwegian threespine stickleback populations
【24h】

The temporal window of ecological adaptation in postglacial lakes: a comparison of head morphology, trophic position and habitat use in Norwegian threespine stickleback populations

机译:冰川后湖泊生态适应的时间窗:挪威三脊stick背种群的头部形态,营养位置和栖息地利用的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background Studying how trophic traits and niche use are related in natural populations is important in order to understand adaptation and specialization. Here, we describe trophic trait diversity in twenty-five Norwegian freshwater threespine stickleback populations and their putative marine ancestor, and relate trait differences to postglacial lake age. By studying lakes of different ages, depths and distance to the sea we examine key environmental variables that may predict adaptation in trophic position and habitat use. We measured trophic traits including geometric landmarks that integrated variation in head shape as well as gillraker length and number. Trophic position (Tpos) and niche use (α) were estimated from stable isotopes (δ13C, δ15N). A comparison of head shape was also made with two North American benthic-limnetic species pairs. Results We found that head shape differed between marine and freshwater sticklebacks, with marine sticklebacks having more upturned mouths, smaller eyes, larger opercula and deeper heads. Size-adjusted gillraker lengths were larger in marine than in freshwater stickleback. Norwegian sticklebacks were compared on the same head shape axis as the one differentiating the benthic-limnetic North American threespine stickleback species pairs. Here, Norwegian freshwater sticklebacks with a more “limnetic head shape” had more and longer gillrakers than sticklebacks with “benthic head shape”. The “limnetic morph” was positively associated with deeper lakes. Populations differed in α (mean?±?sd: 0.76?±?0.29) and Tpos (3.47?±?0.27), where α increased with gillraker length. Larger fish had a higher Tpos than smaller fish. Compared to the ecologically divergent stickleback species pairs and solitary lake populations in North America, Norwegian freshwater sticklebacks had similar range in Tpos and α values, but much less trait divergences. Conclusions Our results showed trait divergences between threespine stickleback in marine and freshwater environments. Freshwater populations diverged in trophic ecology and trophic traits, but trophic ecology was not related to the elapsed time in freshwater. Norwegian sticklebacks used the same niches as the ecologically divergent North American stickleback species pairs. However, as trophic trait divergences were smaller, and not strongly associated with the ecological niche, ecological adaptations along the benthic-limnetic axis were less developed in Norwegian sticklebacks.
机译:背景技术为了了解适应性和专业性,研究自然种群的营养特性和利基利用之间的关系很重要。在这里,我们描述了25个挪威淡水三脊棘背式种群及其推定的海洋祖先的营养性状多样性,并将性状差异与冰河后湖时代联系起来。通过研究不同年龄,深度和与海的距离的湖泊,我们研究了关键的环境变量,这些变量可以预测营养位置和栖息地使用的适应性。我们测量了营养特征,包括整合了头部形状以及gillraker长度和数量变化的几何标志。根据稳定同位素(δ 13 C,δ 15 N)估算营养位(Tpos)和生态位利用(α)。还用两个北美底栖-边缘物种对进行了头部形状的比较。结果我们发现,海洋and和淡水back的头部形状不同,海洋back的嘴更上翘,眼睛更小,盖更大,头部更深。尺寸调整后的刺ill长度在海洋中比在淡水stick鱼中大。在与北美底栖-边缘型三脊背棘背种类对区分的同一头形轴上比较了挪威棘背鱼。在这里,挪威人的“ lim头形”淡水stick鱼比“贝斯底形” stick鱼长得多。 “边缘变体”与更深的湖泊成正相关。种群的α(平均值±±sd:0.76±±0.29)和Tpos(3.47±±0.27)有所不同,其中α随着gillraker长度的增加而增加。较大的鱼类比较小的鱼类具有更高的Tpos。与北美的生态背species物种对和孤独湖种群相比,挪威淡水背back的Tpos和α值范围相似,但性状差异较小。结论我们的研究结果表明,在海洋和淡水环境中,三脊刺背棘的性状存在差异。淡水种群的营养生态和营养特性不同,但营养生态与淡水的经过时间无关。挪威棘背used使用的生态位与北美生态背鳍物种对相同。然而,由于营养特征的差异较小,并且与生态位没有紧密联系,因此在挪威stick鱼中,沿底栖-立面轴的生态适应性较差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号