...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Advance care planning after hospital discharge: qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews
【24h】

Advance care planning after hospital discharge: qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers from patient interviews

机译:出院后提前进行护理计划:定性分析促进因素和患者访谈的障碍

获取原文
           

摘要

Patients who engage in Advance Care Planning (ACP) are more likely to get care consistent with their values. We sought to?determine the barriers and facilitators to ACP engagement after discharge from hospital. Prior to discharge from hospital eligible patients received a standardized conversation about prognosis and ACP. Each patient was given an ACP workbook and asked to complete it over the following four weeks. We included?frail elderly patients with a high risk of death admitted to general internal medicine wards at a tertiary care academic teaching hospital. Four weeks after discharge we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed with thematic analysis. Themes were categorized according to the theoretical domains framework. We performed 17 interviews. All Theoretical Domain Framework components except for Social/Professional Identity and Behavioral Regulation were identified in our data. Poor knowledge about ACP and physician communication skills were barriers partially addressed by our intervention. Some patients found it difficult to discuss ACP during an acute illness. For others acute illness made ACP discussions more relevant. Uncertainty about future health motivated some participants to engage in ACP while others found that ACP discussions prevented them from living in the moment and stripped them of hope that better days were ahead. For some patients?acute illness resulting in admission to hospital can be an opportunity to engage in ACP conversations but for others ACP discussions are antithetical to the goals of hospital care.
机译:参与预先护理计划(ACP)的患者更有可能获得与其价值观相符的护理。我们试图确定出院后参与ACP的障碍和促进者。在出院之前,合格的患者接受了有关预后和ACP的标准化对话。为每位患者提供了ACP工作簿,并要求在接下来的四个星期内完成工作簿。我们纳入了三级学术教学医院的普通内科病房中有高死亡风险的脆弱的老年患者。出院后四个星期,我们对患者进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈进行转录,编码和主题分析。根据理论领域框架对主题进行了分类。我们进行了17次采访。在我们的数据中,除社会/专业认同和行为规范外,所有理论领域框架的组成部分均已确定。关于ACP知识和医生沟通技巧的知识匮乏是我们干预措施部分解决的障碍。一些患者发现在急性疾病期间难以讨论ACP。对于其他一些急性疾病,ACP的讨论更为重要。对未来健康的不确定性促使一些参与者加入ACP,而另一些参与者则发现,ACP的讨论阻止了他们暂时活在当下,并剥夺了他们对美好未来的希望。对于某些患者而言,导致入院的急性疾病可能是进行ACP对话的机会,但对于另一些患者,ACP的讨论与医院护理的目标相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号