...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Endocrine Disorders >Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)
【24h】

Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)

机译:社会人口统计学的决定因素和结构化个人糖尿病护理的效果:一项随机对照研究糖尿病护理的19年随访

获取原文
           

摘要

We investigated how four aspects of socio-demography influence the effectiveness of an intervention with structured personal diabetes care on long-term outcomes. The Diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP) study is a cluster-randomized trial involving a population-based sample of 1381 patients with newly diagnosed type 2-diabetes mellitus. We investigated how education, employment, cohabitation status and residence influenced the effectiveness of 6?years of intervention with structured personal diabetes care, resembling present day recommendations. Outcomes were incidence of any diabetes-related endpoint and death during 19?years after diagnosis, and cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes and process-of-care variables 6?years after diagnosis. Structured personal care reduced the risk of any diabetes-related endpoint and the effect of the intervention was modified by geographical area (interaction p?=?0.034) with HR of 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60–0.85) and of 1.07 (95%CI: 0.77–1.48), for patients in urban and rural areas, respectively. Otherwise, there was no effect modification of education, employment and civil status on the intervention for the final endpoints. There were no noticeable socio-demographic differences in the effect of the intervention on cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes, and process-of-care. Structured personal care reduced the aggregate outcome of any diabetes-related endpoint and independent of socio-demographic factors similar effect on cardiovascular risk factors, behaviour, attitudes and process of care, but the intervention did not change the existing inequity in mortality and morbidity. Residence modified the uptake of the intervention with patients living in urban areas having more to gain of the intervention than rural patients, further investigations is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01074762 (February 24, 2010).
机译:我们调查了社会人口统计学的四个方面如何影响结构化个人糖尿病护理对长期结果的干预效果。全科糖尿病护理(DCGP)研究是一项集群随机试验,涉及1381名新诊断为2型糖尿病的患者的人群为基础的样本。我们调查了教育,就业,同居状态和居住状况如何影响结构化个人糖尿病护理6年干预的有效性,类似于当前的建议。结果是诊断后19年内任何与糖尿病相关的终点事件和死亡的发生率,以及诊断后6年内的心血管危险因素,行为,态度和护理过程变量。结构化的个人护理降低了任何与糖尿病相关的终点的风险,干预措施的效果因地理区域(相互作用p?=?0.034)而改变,HR分别为0.71(95%CI:0.60-0.85)和1.07(95%) CI:0.77-1.48),分别适用于城市和农村地区的患者。否则,教育,就业和公民地位的修改不会对最终目标产生影响。干预对心血管危险因素,行为,态度和护理过程的影响没有明显的社会人口统计学差异。结构化的个人护理减少了任何与糖尿病相关的终点的总结局,并且独立于社会人口统计学因素,对心血管危险因素,行为,态度和护理过程的影响类似,但该干预措施并未改变现有的死亡率和发病率不平等现象。对于居住在城市地区的患者,与居住在农村地区的患者相比,获得住院治疗的患者要比农村患者获得更多的干预,Residence对此进行了修改,因此有必要进行进一步调查。 ClinicalTrials.gov注册号NCT01074762(2010年2月24日)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号