...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >All purulence is local – epidemiology and management of skin and soft tissue infections in three urban emergency departments
【24h】

All purulence is local – epidemiology and management of skin and soft tissue infections in three urban emergency departments

机译:所有的脓性疾病都是地方性的–在三个城市急诊科中流行病学和皮肤和软组织感染的管理

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Skin and soft tissue infection (SSTIs) are commonly treated in emergency departments (EDs). While the precise role of antibiotics in treating SSTIs remains unclear, most SSTI patients receive empiric antibiotics, often targeted toward methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The goal of this study was to assess the efficiency with which ED clinicians targeted empiric therapy against MRSA, and to identify factors that may allow ED clinicians to safely target antibiotic use. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patient visits for community-acquired SSTIs to three urban, academic EDs in one northeastern US city during the first quarter of 2010. We examined microbiologic patterns among cultured SSTIs, and relationships between clinical and demographic factors and management of SSTIs. Results Antibiotics were prescribed to 86.1% of all patients. Though S. aureus (60% MRSA) was the most common pathogen cultured, antibiotic susceptibility differed between adult and pediatric patients. Susceptibility of S. aureus from ED SSTIs differed from published local antibiograms, with greater trimethoprim resistance and less fluoroquinolone resistance than seen in S. aureus from all hospital sources. Empiric antibiotics covered the resultant pathogen in 85.3% of cases, though coverage was frequently broader than necessary. Conclusions Though S. aureus remained the predominant pathogen in community-acquired SSTIs, ED clinicians did not accurately target therapy toward the causative pathogen. Incomplete local epidemiologic data may contribute to this degree of discordance. Future efforts should seek to identify when antibiotic use can be narrowed or withheld. Local, disease-specific antibiotic resistance patterns should be publicized with the goal of improving antibiotic stewardship.
机译:背景技术皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)通常在急诊科(ED)中接受治疗。虽然尚不清楚抗生素在治疗SSTI中的确切作用,但大多数SSTI患者仍接受经验性抗生素,通常针对耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。这项研究的目的是评估ED临床医生针对MRSA进行经验治疗的效率,并确定可能使ED临床医生安全地针对抗生素使用的因素。方法我们回顾性分析了2010年第一季度对美国东北部一个城市的3个城市学术ED进行的社区获得性SSTI患者就诊的情况。我们研究了培养的SSTI中的微生物学模式,以及临床和人口统计学因素与治疗的关系。 SSTI。结果所有患者中有86.1%的患者开了抗生素。尽管金黄色葡萄球菌(60%MRSA)是培养的最常见病原体,但成人和儿童患者的抗生素敏感性不同。与所有医院来源的金黄色葡萄球菌相比,ED SSTIs对金黄色葡萄球菌的敏感性与已发表的局部抗菌谱有所不同,甲氧苄氨嘧啶耐药性更高,氟喹诺酮耐药性更低。经验性抗生素在85.3%的病例中覆盖了最终的病原体,尽管覆盖面常常超出了必要范围。结论尽管金黄色葡萄球菌仍然是社区获得性SSTI中的主要病原体,但ED临床医生并未准确地针对致病性病原体进行治疗。局部流行病学数据不完整可能会导致这种不一致。未来的努力应设法确定何时可以缩小或停止使用抗生素。应当宣传局部,特定疾病的抗生素耐药性模式,以提高抗生素管理水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号