首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >Implementing wait-time reductions under Ontario government benchmarks (Pay-for-Results): a Cluster Randomized Trial of the Effect of a Physician-Nurse Supplementary Triage Assistance team (MDRNSTAT) on emergency department patient wait times
【24h】

Implementing wait-time reductions under Ontario government benchmarks (Pay-for-Results): a Cluster Randomized Trial of the Effect of a Physician-Nurse Supplementary Triage Assistance team (MDRNSTAT) on emergency department patient wait times

机译:在安大略省政府基准下实施减少等待时间(按结果付费):医师-护士补充分类协助小组(MDRNSTAT)对急诊科患者等待时间影响的集群随机试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Internationally, emergency departments are struggling with crowding and its associated morbidity, mortality, and decreased patient and health-care worker satisfaction. The objective was to evaluate the addition of a MDRNSTAT (Physician (MD)-Nurse (RN) Supplementary Team At Triage) on emergency department patient flow and quality of care. Methods Pragmatic cluster randomized trial. From 131 weekday shifts (8:00–14:30) during a 26-week period, we randomized 65?days (3173 visits) to the intervention cluster with a MDRNSTAT presence, and 66?days (3163 visits) to the nurse-only triage control cluster. The primary outcome was emergency department length-of-stay (EDLOS) for patients managed and discharged only by the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included EDLOS for patients initially seen by the emergency department, and subsequently consulted and admitted, patients reaching government-mandated thresholds, time to initial physician assessment, left-without being seen rate, time to investigation, and measurement of harm. Results The intervention’s median EDLOS for discharged, non-consulted, high acuity patients was 4:05 [95th% CI: 3:58 to 4:15] versus 4:29 [95th% CI: 4:19–4:38] during comparator shifts. The intervention’s median EDLOS for discharged, non-consulted, low acuity patients was 1:55 [95th% CI: 1:48 to 2:05] versus 2:08 [95th% CI: 2:02–2:14]. The intervention’s median physician initial assessment time was 0:55 [95th% CI: 0:53 to 0:58] versus 1:21 [95th% CI: 1:18 to 1:25]. The intervention’s left-without-being-seen rate was 1.5% versus 2.2% for the control (p = 0.06). The MDRNSTAT subgroup analysis resulted in significant decreases in median EDLOS for discharged, non-consulted high (4:01 [95th% CI: 3:43–4:16]) and low acuity patients (1:10 95th% CI: 0:58–1:19]), as well as physician initial assessment time (0:25 [95th% CI: 0:23–0:26]). No patients returned to the emergency department after being discharged by the MDRNSTAT at triage. Conclusions The intervention reduced delays and left-without-being-seen rate without increased return visits or jeopardizing urgent care of severely ill patients. Trial registration number NCT00991471 ClinicalTrials.gov
机译:背景技术在国际上,急诊科正忙于拥挤及其相关的发病率,死亡率以及患者和医护人员满意度的下降。目的是评估急诊科病人流量和护理质量的MDRNSTAT(医师(MD)-护士(RN)分诊补充小组)的增加。方法实用性整群随机试验。在26周的时间里,从131个工作日的轮班(8:00–14:30)开始,我们将随机分配65天(3173次访问)到具有MDRNSTAT的干预组,然后将66天(3163次访问)分配给护士-仅分类控制集群。主要结果是仅由急诊科管理和出院的急诊科住院时间(EDLOS)。次要结果包括急诊科最初就诊,随后接受咨询和入院的患者的EDLOS,患者达到政府规定的阈值,进行初次医师评估的时间,不予观察的发生率,调查时间和伤害程度。结果出院,未咨询,高敏患者的干预措施中值EDLOS为4:05 [95 % CI:3:58至4:15]和4:29 [95 th % CI:4:19–4:38]。出院,未咨询,低敏患者的干预措施中值EDLOS为1:55 [95 % CI:1:48至2:05]与2:08 [95 th% CI:2:02–2:14]。干预措施的中位医师初始评估时间为0:55 [95 th% CI:0:53至0:58]和1:21 [95 th% CI:1 :18至1:25]。干预措施的遗留率为1.5%,对照组为2.2%(p = 0.06)。 MDRNSTAT亚组分析导致出院,未经咨询的高(4:01 [95 th% CI:3:43–4:16])和低敏度患者(1 :10 95 th% CI:0:58–1:19]),以及医生的初始评估时间(0:25 [95 th% CI:0:25: 23–0:26])。 MDRNSTAT分流出院后,没有患者返回急诊科。结论干预措施减少了延误和遗留率,而没有增加回诊次数或危及重症患者的紧急护理。试验注册号NCT00991471 ClinicalTrials.gov

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号