首页> 外文期刊>BMC Obesity >Randomised, double-blind, clinical investigation to compare orlistat 60 milligram and a customized polyglucosamine, two treatment methods for the management of overweight and obesity
【24h】

Randomised, double-blind, clinical investigation to compare orlistat 60 milligram and a customized polyglucosamine, two treatment methods for the management of overweight and obesity

机译:随机,双盲临床研究以比较奥利司他60毫克和定制的聚葡萄糖胺,这两种治疗超重和肥胖的方法

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe efficacy of a non-prescription drug to support weight loss programs has yet to be compared. This clinical trial investigates the comparability of orlistat 60 milligram (mg) and polyglucosamine. MethodsSixty-four overweight or obese subjects were included in a two-center double-blind study. One center was in Germany [center 1] and the other was in Italy [center 2].The subjects (26 in center 1 and 38 in center 2) were recommended to follow a calorie deficit of about 2000 kilojoules/day and to increase their physical activity to 3 metabolic equivalent hours (MET h)/day. In both centers, subjects were randomized to receive polyglucosamine (2 tablets x 2) or orlistat (1 capsule x 3) for a period of 12 weeks. Weight loss was considered as a main variable together with the reduction of 5 per cent (%) of body weight (5R). Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were taken as secondary variables. ResultsA significant difference in weight loss between the two groups was shown, 6.7?±?3.14 kilogram (kg) in group polyglucosamine versus 4.8?±?2.24 kg in group orlistat (t test p p p >?0.05).The administration of polyglucosamine following energy restriction and increase in physical activity reduces body weight, BMI and WC more efficiently than orlistat ConclusionsEven though both groups were instructed to adopt a calorie restricted diet together with increased physical activity an additional weight loss in the polyglucosamine group of 1.6 kilogram (kg) compared to the orlistat group (6.2?±?3.46 versus 4.6?±?2.36 kg) in both centers was seen despite the higher consumption of carbohydrates in Italy (center 2). A typical Italian diet is usually high in carbohydrate content whereas Germans tend to consume meals with higher fat content. This leads to the assumption that polyglucosamine limits both fat and carbohydrate absorption which would explain the comparable effective weight reduction in the Italian participants. Trial registrationTrial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529631 , registered on Aug 19, 2015 retrospectively registered.
机译:背景非处方药支持减肥计划的功效尚未进行比较。该临床试验研究了奥利司他60毫克(mg)和聚葡萄糖胺的可比性。方法:64位超重或肥胖的受试者被纳入了一个双中心双中心研究。一个中心在德国[中心1],另一个在意大利[中心2]。建议受试者(中心1的26个和中心2的38个)每天跟踪约2000千焦耳的热量缺乏症,并增加他们的热量每天3个代谢当量小时(MET h)的体力活动。在这两个中心,受试者被随机分配接受聚葡萄糖胺(2片x 2)或奥利司他(1胶囊x 3),持续12周。体重减轻与体重减轻(5%R)减少5%(%)一起被视为主要变量。体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)被作为次要变量。结果显示两组之间的体重减轻有显着差异,聚葡萄糖胺组为6.7?±?3.14千克(kg),奥利司他组为4.8?±?2.24 kg(t测试ppp>?0.05)。结论:即使两组都被指示采取热量限制饮食,同时增加了运动量,聚葡萄糖胺组的体重减轻了1.6公斤(kg),相比奥利司他更有效地减轻了体重,BMI和WC。尽管意大利(中心2)的碳水化合物消耗量较高,但在两个中心的奥利司他组(6.2±±3.46公斤vs 4.6±±2.36公斤)仍可见。典型的意大利饮食通常碳水化合物含量高,而德国人则倾向于食用脂肪含量更高的膳食。这导致了一个假设,即聚葡萄糖胺限制了脂肪和碳水化合物的吸收,这可以解释意大利参与者相当有效的体重减轻。试验注册于2015年8月19日在ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529631上进行的注册回顾性注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号