首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Ethical challenges experienced by UK military medical personnel deployed to Sierra Leone (operation GRITROCK) during the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak: a qualitative study
【24h】

Ethical challenges experienced by UK military medical personnel deployed to Sierra Leone (operation GRITROCK) during the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak: a qualitative study

机译:在2014-2015年埃博拉疫情爆发期间,部署到塞拉利昂(行动GRITROCK)的英国军事医务人员遇到的道德挑战:定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

As part of its response to the 2014 Ebola outbreak in west Africa, the United Kingdom (UK) government established an Ebola treatment unit in Sierra Leone, staffed by military personnel. Little is known about the ethical challenges experienced by military medical staff on humanitarian deployment. We designed a qualitative study to explore this further with those who worked in the treatment unit. Semi-structured, face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with 20 UK military personnel deployed between October 2014 and April 2015 in one of three roles in the Ebola treatment unit: clinician; nursing and nursing assistant; and other medical support work, including infection control and laboratory and mortuary services. Many participants reported feeling ethically motivated to volunteer for deployment, but for some personal interests were also a consideration. A small minority had negative feelings towards the deployment, others felt that this deployment like any other was part of military service. Almost all had initial concerns about personal safety but were reassured by their pre-deployment 'drills and skills', and personal protective equipment. Risk perceptions were related to perceptions about military service. Efforts to minimise infection risk were perceived to have made good patient care more difficult. Significantly, some thought the humanitarian nature of the mission justified tolerating greater risks to staff. Trust in the military institution and colleagues was expressed; many participants referred to the ethical obligation within the chain of command to protect those under their command. Participants expected resources to be overwhelmed and ‘empty beds’ presented a significant and pervasive ethical challenge. Most thought more patients could and should have been treated. Points of reference for participants’ ethical values were: previous deployment experience; previous UK/National Health Service experience; professional ethics; and, distinctly military values (that might not be shared with non-military workers). We report the first systematic exploration of the ethical challenges face by a Western medical military in the international response to the first major Ebola outbreak. We offer unique insights into the military healthcare workers’ experiences of humanitarian deployment. Many participants expressed motivations that gave them common purpose with civilian volunteers.
机译:作为对2014年西非埃博拉疫情的回应,英国(UK)政府在塞拉利昂建立了埃博拉治疗单位,并配备了军事人员。对于军事医务人员在人道主义部署方面遇到的道德挑战知之甚少。我们设计了定性研究,以与治疗单位的工作人员进一步探讨。在2014年10月至2015年4月之间部署的20名英国军事人员进行了半结构化,面对面和电话采访,他们是埃博拉治疗单位的三个角色之一:临床医生;护理和护理助理;以及其他医疗支持工作,包括感染控制以及实验室和mort房服务。许多参与者报告说,出于道德动机有志于自愿进行部署,但是出于个人利益考虑也是要考虑的。一小部分人对该部署抱有消极的感觉,其他人则认为这种部署与其他部署一样,都是兵役的一部分。几乎所有人最初都对人身安全感到担忧,但部署前的“演习和技能”以及个人防护设备使他们放心。风险观念与对兵役的观念有关。人们认为将感染风险降至最低的努力使良好的患者护理更加困难。值得注意的是,有些人认为特派团的人道主义性质有理由容忍工作人员面临更大的风险。表达了对军事机构及其同事的信任;许多参与者提到了指挥链中的道德义务,以保护其指挥下的人员。与会人员预计资源将不堪重负,“空床”构成了重大而普遍的道德挑战。大多数人认为更多的患者可以而且应该接受治疗。参与者的道德价值观的参考点是:以前的部署经验;以前的英国/国家卫生服务经验;职业道德;以及明显的军事价值观(非军事工作者可能不会分享)。我们报告了西方医务人员在国际应对首次重大埃博拉疫情中所面临的道德挑战的首次系统探索。我们提供了有关军事医护人员人道主义部署经验的独特见解。许多参与者表达了与平民志愿者共同的目标动机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号