首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Global medicine: Is it ethical or morally justifiable for doctors and other healthcare workers to go on strike?
【24h】

Global medicine: Is it ethical or morally justifiable for doctors and other healthcare workers to go on strike?

机译:全球医学:医生和其他医护人员进行罢工是否在道德上或道义上合理?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Doctor and healthcare worker (HCW) strikes are a global phenomenon with the potential to negatively impact on the quality of healthcare services and the doctor-patient relationship. Strikes are a legitimate deadlock breaking mechanism employed when labour negotiations have reached an impasse during collective bargaining. Striking doctors usually have a moral dilemma between adherence to the Hippocratic tenets of the medical profession and fiduciary obligation to patients. In such circumstances the ethical principles of respect for autonomy, justice and beneficence all come into conflict, whereby doctors struggle with their role as ordinary employees who are rightfully entitled to a just wage for just work versus their moral obligations to patients and society. Discussion It has been argued that to deny any group of workers, including "essential workers" the right to strike is akin to enslavement which is ethically and morally indefensible. While HCW strikes occur globally, the impact appears more severe in developing countries challenged by poorer socio-economic circumstances, embedded infrastructural deficiencies, and lack of viable alternative means of obtaining healthcare. These communities appear to satisfy the criteria for vulnerability and may be deserving of special ethical consideration when doctor and HCW strikes are contemplated. Summary The right to strike is considered a fundamental right whose derogation would be inimical to the proper functioning of employer/employee collective bargaining in democratic societies. Motivations for HCW strikes include the natural pressure to fulfil human needs and the paradigm shift in modern medical practice, from self-employment and benevolent paternalism, to managed healthcare and consumer rights. Minimizing the incidence and impact of HCW strikes will require an ethical approach from all stakeholders, and recognition that all parties have an equal moral obligation to serve the best interests of society. Employers should implement legitimate collective bargaining agreements in a timely manner and high-handed actions such as mass-firing of striking HCWs, or unjustifiable disciplinary action by regulators should be avoided. Minimum service level agreements should be implemented to mitigate the impact of HCW strikes on indigent populations. Striking employees including HCWs should also desist from making unrealistic wage demands which could bankrupt governments/employers or hamper provision of other equally important social services to the general population.
机译:背景技术医生和医护人员(HCW)罢工是一种全球性现象,有可能对医疗服务质量和医患关系产生负面影响。当劳资谈判在集体谈判中陷入僵局时,罢工是打破僵局的合法机制。打击医生通常在遵守医疗行业希波克拉底信条和对患者的信托义务之间存在道德困境。在这种情况下,尊重自治,正义和仁慈的道德原则都发生了冲突,因此,医生们在作为普通雇员的角色中挣扎,他们应有资格获得公正的公正工作工资,而不是对患者和社会的道德义务。讨论有人争辩说,拒绝包括“基本工人”在内的任何工人群体罢工权类似于奴隶制,这在道德和道德上都是不可辩驳的。尽管在全球范围内发生医务工作者的罢工,但在发展中国家,由于社会经济状况较差,基础设施固有的缺陷以及缺乏获得医疗保健的可行替代手段的挑战,影响似乎更为严重。这些社区似乎满足脆弱性标准,并且在考虑进行医生和医务工作者罢工时可能值得特别的道德考虑。概述罢工权被视为一项基本权利,其减损将不利于民主社会中雇主/雇员集体谈判的正常运作。医护人员罢工的动机包括满足人类需求的自然压力以及现代医疗实践的范式转变,从个体经营和仁慈的家长式服务,到有管理的医疗保健和消费者权益。为了最大程度地减少HCW罢工的发生和影响,需要所有利益相关者采取符合道德的方法,并认识到各方都有平等的道德义务来为社会的最大利益服务。用人单位应及时执行合法的集体谈判协议,并应避免采取大手笔的行动,例如大规模打击罢工的医务工作者,或避免监管者采取不合理的纪律处分。应当执行最低服务水平协议,以减轻医务工作者罢工对贫困人口的影响。罢工的雇员,包括医护工作者,也应避免提出不切实际的工资要求,这可能会使政府/雇主破产,或妨碍向普通民众提供其他同样重要的社会服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号