...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cardiovascular Disorders >Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of intracoronary administration of tirofiban for no-reflow phenomenon
【24h】

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of intracoronary administration of tirofiban for no-reflow phenomenon

机译:冠状动脉内给予替罗非班治疗无复流现象的有效性和安全性的随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Currently, there is still a lack of an optimal treatment for no-reflow phenomenon (NR). The aim of this simple meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) administration of tirofiban compared with other conventional drugs during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for NR. Methods Systematic literature search was done from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Springer and CNKI databases without language or time limitation. Randomized controlled trials were enrolled for analyzing if they investigated the treatment of IC administration of tirofiban versus other conventional drugs for NR. Results Ten studies with 702 patients were included. Significantly, the treatment of tirofiban was more effective in improving the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.37, P? Conclusions Tirofiban is more effective than conventional drugs for NR during PCI, but the potential risk of bleeding complication induced by tirofiban shouldn’t be ignored during clinical practices.
机译:背景技术当前,仍然缺乏针对无回流现象(NR)的最佳治疗方法。这项简单的荟萃分析的目的是评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与其他常规药物相比,替罗非班在冠状动脉内(IC)给药的疗效和安全性。方法从PubMed,EMBASE,Google Scholar,EBSCO,Springer和CNKI数据库中进行系统文献检索,没有语言或时间限制。参加了一项随机对照试验,以分析它们是否研究了替罗非班与其他常规药物治疗IC的IC替代治疗。结果纳入10项研究,共702例患者。值得注意的是,替罗非班治疗可更有效地改善心肌梗塞(TIMI)血栓溶解(OR 0.24,95%CI 0.15-0.37,P?)结论对于在PCI期间NR,替罗非班比常规药物更有效,但存在潜在风险在临床实践中,不应忽略替罗非班引起的出血并发症的发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号