...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cardiovascular Disorders >Predictors of non-invasive therapy and 28-day-case fatality in elderly compared to younger patients with acute myocardial infarction: an observational study from the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry
【24h】

Predictors of non-invasive therapy and 28-day-case fatality in elderly compared to younger patients with acute myocardial infarction: an observational study from the MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry

机译:与年轻的急性心肌梗死患者相比,老年人无创治疗和28天死亡的预测指标:MONICA / KORA心肌梗死注册中心的一项观察性研究

获取原文

摘要

Background A substantial proportion of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) did not receive invasive therapy, defined as percutaneous coronary intervention and/or coronary artery bypass grafting. Aims of this study were to evaluate predictors of non-invasive therapy in elderly compared to younger AMI patients and to assess the association between invasive therapy and 28-day-case fatality. Methods From the German population-based registry, 3475 persons, consecutively hospitalized with an AMI between 2009 and 2012 were included. Data were collected by standardized interviews and chart review. All-cause mortality was assessed on a regular basis. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results The sample consisted of 1329 patients aged 28–65 years (age category [AC] 1), 1083 aged 65–74 years (AC 2), and 1063 aged 75–84 years (AC 3). The proportion of patients receiving non-invasive therapy was 10.7, 17.7, and 35.8?% in AC 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Predictors of non-invasive therapy in all ACs were non-ST segment elevation MI, bundle branch block, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, prior stroke, absence of hyperlipidemia, and low creatine kinase. Elderly women (≥65?years) were less likely to receive invasive therapy. Stratifying the models by type of AMI revealed fewer predictors in patients with ST segment elevation MI. Regarding 28-day-case fatality, strong inverse relations with invasive therapy were seen in all AC: odds ratio of 0.35 (95?% confidence interval [CI] 0.15–0.84), 0.45 (95?% CI 0.22–0.92), and 0.39 (95?% CI 0.24–0.63) in AC 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion In today’s real-life patient care we found that predictors of non-invasive therapy were predominantly the same in all age groups, but differed particularly by type of AMI. Further research is necessary to investigate the real reasons for non-invasive therapy, especially among elderly women. Moreover, we confirmed that receiving invasive therapy was inversely associated with 28-day-case fatality independent of age.
机译:背景技术急性心肌梗死(AMI)的大部分患者未接受侵入性治疗,定义为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和/或冠状动脉搭桥术。这项研究的目的是评估与年轻的AMI患者相比,老年人进行非侵入性治疗的预测指标,并评估侵入性治疗与28天病死率之间的关联。方法在德国人口登记处,纳入2009年至2012年间连续AMI住院的3475人。通过标准化访谈和图表审查收集数据。定期评估全因死亡率。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析。结果样本包括1329名28-65岁(年龄类别[AC] 1),1083名65-74岁(AC 2)和1063 75-84岁(AC 3)的患者。在AC 1、2和3中,接受无创治疗的患者比例分别为10.7、17.7和35.8%。所有AC中无创治疗的预测指标为非ST段抬高MI,束支传导阻滞,左心室射血分数降低,先前卒中,高脂血症不存在和肌酸激酶低。老年妇女(≥65岁)接受侵入性治疗的可能性较小。按AMI类型对模型进行分层后,发现ST段抬高型MI患者的预测因素较少。关于28天的病死率,在所有AC中均发现与侵入性治疗有强烈的逆关系:比值比分别为0.35(95%置信区间[CI] 0.15-0.84),0.45(95%CI 0.22-0.92)和在AC 1、2和3中分别为0.39(95?%CI 0.24-0.63)。结论在当今的现实生活患者护理中,我们发现非侵入性治疗的预测因素在所有年龄组中基本上都是相同的,但在AMI类型方面尤其不同。有必要进行进一步研究以调查无创治疗的真正原因,尤其是在老年妇女中。此外,我们证实接受侵入性治疗与28天病死率成反比,与年龄无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号