首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Risks of postoperative paresis in motor eloquently and non-eloquently located brain metastases
【24h】

Risks of postoperative paresis in motor eloquently and non-eloquently located brain metastases

机译:雄辩性和非雄辩性脑转移的术后轻瘫风险

获取原文
           

摘要

Background When treating cerebral metastases all involved multidisciplinary oncological specialists have to cooperate closely to provide the best care for these patients. For the resection of brain metastasis several studies reported a considerable risk of new postoperative paresis. Pre- and perioperative chemotherapy (Ctx) or radiotherapy (Rtx) alter vasculature and adjacent fiber tracts on the one hand, and many patients already present with paresis prior to surgery on the other hand. As such factors were repeatedly considered risk factors for perioperative complications, we designed this study to also identify risk factors for brain metastases resection. Methods Between 2006 and 2011, we resected 206 brain metastases consecutively, 56 in eloquent motor areas and 150 in non-eloquent ones. We evaluated the influences of preoperative paresis, previous Rtx or Ctx as well as recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class on postoperative outcome. Results In general, 8.7% of all patients postoperatively developed a new permanent paresis. In contrast to preoperative Ctx, previous Rtx as a single or combined treatment strategy was a significant risk factor for postoperative motor weakness. This risk was even increased in perirolandic and rolandic lesions. Our data show significantly increased risk of new deficits for patients assigned to RPA class 3. Even in non-eloquently located brain metastases the risk of new postoperative paresis has not to be underestimated. Despite the microsurgical approach, our cohort shows a high rate of unexpected residual tumors in postoperative MRI, which supports recent data on brain metastases’ infiltrative nature but might also be the result of our strict study protocol. Conclusions Surgical resection is a safe treatment of brain metastases. However, preoperative Rtx and RPA score 3 have to be taken into account when surgical resection is considered.
机译:背景技术在治疗脑转移瘤时,所有涉足的多学科肿瘤学专家都必须密切合作以为这些患者提供最佳护理。对于脑转移瘤的切除术,一些研究报告了发生新的术后轻瘫的风险。术前和围手术期化学疗法(Ctx)或放射疗法(Rtx)一方面会改变脉管系统和邻近的纤维束,另一方面,许多患者在手术前已经出现轻瘫。由于这些因素被反复考虑为围手术期并发症的危险因素,因此我们设计本研究的目的还在于确定脑转移瘤切除的危险因素。方法2006年至2011年间,我们连续切除了206例脑转移瘤,在运动能力较差的区域切除了56例,在非运动能力较差的区域切除了150例。我们评估了术前麻痹,先前的Rtx或Ctx以及递归分区分析(RPA)类对术后结果的影响。结果一般而言,所有患者中有8.7%术后出现新的永久性轻瘫。与术前Ctx相比,以前的Rtx作为单一或联合治疗策略是术后运动无力的重要危险因素。在腹周和罗兰病变中这种风险甚至增加。我们的数据显示,分配给RPA 3级的患者出现新的赤字的风险显着增加,即使在非雄辩的脑转移瘤中,也不应低估发生新的术后轻瘫的风险。尽管采用了显微外科手术方法,我们的队列在术后MRI中仍显示出较高的意外肿瘤残留率,这支持了有关脑转移灶浸润性质的最新数据,但这也可能是我们严格研究方案的结果。结论手术切除是治疗脑转移的安全方法。但是,考虑手术切除时,必须考虑术前Rtx和RPA评分3。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号