首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Single administration of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy versus continuous treatment with sorafeNIB in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SIR ve NIB): study protocol for a phase iii randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Single administration of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy versus continuous treatment with sorafeNIB in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SIR ve NIB): study protocol for a phase iii randomized controlled trial

机译:在局部晚期肝细胞癌(SIR ve NIB)中单次施用选择性内部放射疗法与持续使用sorafeNIB进行连续治疗:一项III期随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Approximately 20?% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients diagnosed in the early stages may benefit from potentially curative ablative therapies such as surgical resection, transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. For patients not eligible for such options, prognosis is poor. Sorafenib and Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) are clinically proven treatment options in patients with unresectable HCC, and this study aims to assess overall survival following either SIRT or Sorafenib therapy for locally advanced HCC patients. Methods This investigator-initiated, multi-centre, open-label, randomized, controlled trial will enrol 360 patients with locally advanced HCC, as defined by Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or stage C, without distant metastases, and which is not amenable to immediate curative treatment. Exclusion criteria include previous systemic therapy, metastatic disease, complete occlusion of the main portal vein, or a Child-Pugh score of >7. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 and stratified by centre and presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis to receive either a single administration of SIRT using yttrium-90 resin microspheres (SIR-Spheres?, Sirtex Medical Limited, Sydney, Australia) targeted at HCC in the liver by the trans-arterial route or continuous oral Sorafenib (Nexavar?, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) at a dose of 400?mg twice daily until disease progression, no further response, complete regression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients for both the Sorafenib and SIRT arms will be followed-up every 4?weeks for the first 3?months and 12 weekly thereafter. Overall survival is the primary endpoint, assessed for the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints are tumour response rate, time-to-tumour progression, progression free survival, quality of life and down-staging to receive potentially curative therapy. Discussion Definitive data comparing these two therapies will help to determine clinical practice in the large group of patients with locally advanced HCC and improve outcomes for such patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01135056 , first received 24, May 2010.
机译:背景技术在早期诊断出的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,约有20%可能受益于潜在的根治性消融疗法,例如手术切除,移植或射频消融。对于不符合此类选择条件的患者,预后较差。索拉非尼和选择性内部放射疗法(SIRT)是不可切除的HCC患者的临床证明治疗选择,本研究旨在评估SIRT或索拉非尼治疗局部晚期HCC患者的总体生存率。方法这项由研究人员发起的,多中心,开放标签,随机对照试验,将纳入360例局部晚期HCC患者,这些患者由巴塞罗那临床肝癌B期或C期定义,无远处转移,不宜转移。立即治愈。排除标准包括先前的全身治疗,转移性疾病,主门静脉完全闭塞或Child-Pugh评分> 7。符合条件的患者将按1:1的比例随机分组,并按中心,是否存在门静脉血栓进行分层,以使用靶向Yttrium-90树脂微球(SIR-Spheres?,Sirtex Medical Limited,澳大利亚悉尼)的SIRT单次给药肝癌通过经动脉途径或连续口服索拉非尼(Nexavar?,Bayer Pharma AG,柏林,德国),每天两次,剂量为400?mg,直至疾病进展,无进一步反应,完全消退或不可接受的毒性。索拉非尼和SIRT组的患者将在头3个月中每4周进行一次随访,其后每12周进行一次随访。总生存率是主要终点,是针对意向治疗人群评估的。次要终点是肿瘤反应率,肿瘤进展时间,无进展生存期,生活质量和接受潜在治疗的降级。讨论对比这两种疗法的确切数据将有助于确定大量局部晚期HCC患者的临床实践,并改善此类患者的预后。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT01135056,于2010年5月24日首次收到。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号