...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial
【24h】

SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial

机译:SAKK 24/09:贝伐单抗联合紫杉醇与贝伐单抗联合节律性环磷酰胺和卡培他滨作为HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗的安全性和耐受性-多中心随机III期研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy improves response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We aimed to demonstrate decreased toxicity with metronomic chemotherapy/bevacizumab compared with paclitaxel/bevacizumab. Methods This multicenter, randomized phase III trial compared bevacizumab with either paclitaxel (arm A) or daily oral capecitabine-cyclophosphamide (arm B) as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. The primary endpoint was the incidence of selected grade 3–5 adverse events (AE) including: febrile neutropenia, infection, sensory/motor neuropathy, and mucositis. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, PFS, overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and pharmacoeconomics. The study was registered prospectively with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01131195 on May 25, 2010. Results Between September 2010 and December 2012, 147 patients were included at 22 centers. The incidence of primary endpoint-defining AEs was similar in arm A (25?% [18/71]; 95?% CI 15–35?%) and arm B (24?% [16/68]; 95?% CI 13–34?%; P =?0.96). Objective response rates were 58?% (42/73; 95?% CI 0.46–0.69) and 50?% (37/74; 95?% CI 0.39–0.61) in arms A and B, respectively ( P =?0.45). Median PFS was 10.3?months (95?% CI 8.7–11.3) in arm A and 8.5?months (95?% CI 6.5–11.9) in arm B ( P =?0.90). Other secondary efficacy endpoints were not significantly different between study arms. The only statistically significant differences in QoL were less hair loss and less numbness in arm B. Treatment costs between the two arms were equivalent. Conclusion This trial failed to meet its primary endpoint of a reduced rate of prespecified grade 3–5 AEs with metronomic bevacizumab, cyclophosphamide and capecitabine.
机译:背景在化疗中加入贝伐单抗可提高转移性​​乳腺癌(mBC)的应答率和无进展生存期(PFS)。我们旨在证明与紫杉醇/贝伐单抗相比,节律化疗/贝伐单抗的毒性降低。方法该多中心随机III期试验比较了贝伐单抗与紫杉醇(A组)或每日口服卡培他滨-环磷酰胺(B组)作为HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗。主要终点是选定的3–5级不良事件(AE)的发生率,包括:发热性中性粒细胞减少,感染,感觉/运动神经病和粘膜炎。次要终点包括客观缓解率,疾病控制率,PFS,总生存期(OS),生活质量(QoL)和药物经济学。该研究已于2010年5月25日在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行了前瞻性注册,注册号为NCT01131195。结果在2010年9月至2012年12月之间,共有22个中心的147例患者入选。在A组(25%[18/71]; 95%CI 15–35%)和B组(24%[16/68]; 95%CI)中,主要终点定义的不良事件发生率相似13–34%; P = 0.96)。 A组和B组的客观缓解率分别为58%(42/73; 95%CI 0.46-0.69)和50%(37/74; 95%CI 0.39-0.61)(P =?0.45) 。 A组的中位PFS为10.3个月(95%CI 8.7-11.3),B组的中位PFS为8.5个月(95%CI 6.5-11.9)(P = 0.90)。其他次要功效终点在研究组之间无显着差异。 QoL的唯一统计学上显着差异是B组的脱发和麻木感减少。两个组之间的治疗费用相同。结论:该试验未能达到减少使用预定剂量的贝伐单抗,环磷酰胺和卡培他滨的3-5级预先确定的不良事件发生率的主要终点。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号