...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >Herbal medicine: a survey of use in Nigerian presurgical patients booked for ambulatory anaesthesia
【24h】

Herbal medicine: a survey of use in Nigerian presurgical patients booked for ambulatory anaesthesia

机译:草药:预订非门禁麻醉的尼日利亚术前患者使用情况调查

获取原文

摘要

Background Utilization of herbal medicines in the preoperative period by Nigerian patients booked for day case surgery has not been explored. Methods Cross-sectional survey of 60 patients presenting for day-case surgery at a tertiary healthcare institution over a 3-week period in August 2011 was conducted. Using a structured questionnaire, inquiries were made concerning use of herbal medicines in the immediate preoperative period. Socio-demographic characteristics, information on use of concurrent medical prescriptions, types of herbs used, reasons for use, perceived side effects and perceived efficacy were obtained. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics and Chi-square. Results Fifty-two (86.7%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1 while 8 (13%) were ASA 2. Most patients (86.7%) had their procedures done under local infiltration with monitored anaesthesia care (MAC), while 5.0% and 8.3% had their procedures done under regional and general anaesthesia, respectively. About 48.3% of respondents were on concurrent medical prescriptions while 51.7% were not. Forty percent (40%) of patients admitted to use of herbal medicine, all by the oral route, in the immediate perioperative period; 87.5% did not inform their doctor of their herbal use. Types of herbs used included ‘dogonyaro’, ‘agbo’, ‘nchanwu’, and Tahitian noni. Treatment of malaria was commonest reason for use in 29.2% of patients, while cough and concurrent surgical condition were reasons given by 12.5% of patients, respectively. Seventy-nine percent (79.2%) of patients considered their herbal medications effective. Perceived side effects of herbal medication (16.6%) included fever, waist pain and intoxication. There were no variations in use between ASA 1 and ASA 2 patients and none between respondents on conventional medication against those that were not. Variables such as age less than 35 years, female gender, being married and being an urban dweller did not show any significant difference in use. Conclusion This survey revealed many patients were on one or more herbal preparations in the immediate preoperative period. In consideration of possible untoward drug interactions between conventional medication, herbal preparations and anaesthesia, doctors (especially anaesthetists) should routinely assess all patients booked to be anaesthetized, especially those for day case surgery. The authors recommend surveys with larger respondent numbers to determine prevalence of use and possible interactions between indigenous Nigerian herbs and anaesthesia.
机译:背景技术尚未探讨预订尼日利亚日间手术的患者在术前使用草药的情况。方法于2011年8月进行了为期3周的60例三级医疗机构日间手术患者的横断面调查。使用结构化的调查表,询问术前即刻使用草药的情况。获得了社会人口统计学特征,同时使用医疗处方的信息,所用草药的类型,使用原因,可察觉的副作用和可察觉的功效。使用描述性统计量和卡方检验评估数据。结果美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分类1为52(86.7%),ASA 2为8(13%)。大多数患者(86.7%)均在局部浸润下进行了麻醉监测(MAC)手术,而5.0%和8.3%的手术分别在区域麻醉和全身麻醉下完成。大约48.3%的受访者同时使用医疗处方,而51.7%的受访者则没有。在围手术期即刻,有40%(40%)的患者通过口服途径接受草药治疗; 87.5%的患者未将其草药使用情况告知医生。使用的草药类型包括“ dogonyaro”,“ agbo”,“ nchanwu”和大溪地诺丽。疟疾治疗是29.2%的患者最常见的使用原因,而咳嗽和同时进行的外科手术分别是12.5%的患者使用的原因。 79%(79.2%)的患者认为他们的草药有效。草药的副作用(16.6%)包括发烧,腰部疼痛和中毒。 ASA 1和ASA 2患者之间的使用无差异,常规药物的应答者与未使用常规药物的应答者之间无差异。年龄小于35岁,女性,已婚和成为城市居民等变量在使用上没有显着差异。结论这项调查显示,术前即刻有许多患者使用一种或多种草药制剂。考虑到常规药物,草药制剂和麻醉之间可能发生不良的药物相互作用,医生(特别是麻醉师)应常规评估所有预定接受麻醉的患者,尤其是日间手术患者。作者建议进行更大数量的调查,以确定使用率以及尼日利亚本土草药和麻醉剂之间可能的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号