...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Clinical Pathology >Gender dimorphism in differential peripheral blood leukocyte counts in mice using cardiac, tail, foot, and saphenous vein puncture methods
【24h】

Gender dimorphism in differential peripheral blood leukocyte counts in mice using cardiac, tail, foot, and saphenous vein puncture methods

机译:使用心脏,尾巴,足和大隐静脉穿刺方法对小鼠外周血白细胞计数进行性别二态性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In many animal models that investigate the pathology of various diseases, there is a need to monitor leukocyte counts and differentials. However, various researchers use a range of different techniques in male and female laboratory animals to collect such blood variable information. These studies are then compared to one another without consideration of the possibility that different bleeding sites or techniques as well as gender may produce varying results. In light of this, the peripheral blood leukocyte counts and differentials of C57BL/6 male and female mice were determined using four blood-sampling techniques: cardiac, tail, foot, and saphenous vein punctures. Methods Blood smears were prepared and stained with Wright-stain for differential cell analysis. The total number of peripheral blood leukocytes was determined with the aid of a hemocytometer. Applying ANOVA and Student t-test analysis made comparisons between groups. Results The total leukocyte counts obtained using the cardiac puncture method were significantly lower as compared to the other three blood sources; saphenous, tail and foot. There were no significant differences between leukocyte counts of blood samples collected from the tail, saphenous, and foot. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in total leukocyte counts between male and female mice. Differential analysis showed lymphocytes as the predominant cell type present in the peripheral blood of both male and female mice, comprising 75–90% of the total leukocytes. While no significant differences were observed between male and female differential counts of blood collected from saphenous and tail veins, a significant difference in differential counts of blood obtained via cardiac puncture was observed between the male and female groups, suggesting the role of sex hormones. Further, of the four methods, cardiac puncture appeared to be the fastest and more reliable technique, yielding the maximum blood volume with the least amount of stress being exerted on the sampling site. Conclusions This information suggests that in studies concerning leukocyte counts and differentials, the animal gender and the sampling site of blood collection should be kept consistent as to avoid introducing any misleading experimental variation, and that cardiac puncture is the best method of blood collection in mice.
机译:背景技术在研究各种疾病病理的许多动物模型中,需要监控白细胞计数和差异。但是,各种研究人员在雄性和雌性实验动物中使用了各种不同的技术来收集这种血液变量信息。然后将这些研究相互比较,而不考虑不同的出血部位或技术以及性别可能产生不同结果的可能性。有鉴于此,使用四种血液采样技术:心脏,尾巴,足和大隐静脉穿刺来确定C57BL / 6雄性和雌性小鼠的外周血白细胞计数和差异。方法制备血液涂片并用Wright染色染色以进行差异细胞分析。借助于血细胞计数器测定外周血白细胞的总数。应用方差分析和学生t检验分析进行组间比较。结果与其他三种血源相比,通过心脏穿刺法获得的白细胞总数明显更低。隐性,尾巴和脚。从尾巴,隐足和足收集的血液样本的白细胞计数之间没有显着差异。另外,在雄性和雌性小鼠之间未观察到总白细胞计数的显着差异。差异分析表明,淋巴细胞是雄性和雌性小鼠外周血中的主要细胞类型,占总白细胞的75–90%。虽然从隐静脉和尾静脉采集的男性和女性血液差异计数之间没有显着差异,但在男性和女性组之间,通过心脏穿刺获得的血液差异计数之间却存在显着差异,这表明性激素的作用。此外,在这四种方法中,心脏穿刺似乎是最快,更可靠的技术,可产生最大的血液量,同时在采样部位施加的压力最小。结论该信息表明,在有关白细胞计数和差异的研究中,应保持动物性别和采血取样部位的一致性,以避免引入任何误导性的实验变异,并且心脏穿刺是小鼠采血的最佳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号