...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomedicine International >Is the Theory of Cycling Antibiotic Resistance Applicable?
【24h】

Is the Theory of Cycling Antibiotic Resistance Applicable?

机译:循环抗生素抗性理论是否适用?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

It has been hypothesized that long term application of new generation antibiotics could result in bacterial species which are susceptible to old generation antibiotics. However, there are several factors which make such a hypothesis questionable. Resistance could be reversible but bacteria will die due to the presence of the antibiotic in the bacterial population. Furthermore, if a microorganism becomes resistant to a second generation of antimicrobial agents it will also be resistant to the first generation of that class. In addition, the turnover time for cycling is unknown, the use of new generation antimicrobial agents is expensive, producing a new generation of an antimicrobial class may not be straightforward, and there are different administrations for different generations of a class of an antibiotic. Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial populations is an example of Darwinian evolution. Is it possible that a species with a ‘superior’ phenotype resulting in natural selection of that species over others would lose that phenotype in the future? Considering the aforementioned points, we suggest that cycling antibiotic resistance does not occur, and that it would be extremely unlikely to do so.
机译:假设长期使用新一代抗生素可能会导致细菌种类易受旧抗生素的影响。但是,有几个因素使这种假设值得怀疑。耐药性可以逆转,但由于细菌种群中存在抗生素,细菌将死亡。此外,如果微生物对第二代抗微生物剂产生抗性,那么它也将对该类第一代抗药性。另外,循环的周转时间是未知的,新一代抗菌剂的使用是昂贵的,产生新一代抗菌剂类可能不是直接的,并且对于不同种类的一类抗生素有不同的给药方式。细菌种群中的抗药性是达尔文进化的一个例子。具有“优越”表型的物种会导致该物种比其他物种更自然选择,将来是否会失去该表型?考虑到上述几点,我们建议不发生循环抗生素耐药性,而且极不可能发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号