...
首页> 外文期刊>Biology Direct >Breath-giving cooperation: critical review of origin of mitochondria hypotheses
【24h】

Breath-giving cooperation: critical review of origin of mitochondria hypotheses

机译:令人叹为观止的合作:线粒体假说起源的批判性审查

获取原文
           

摘要

The origin of mitochondria is a unique and hard evolutionary problem, embedded within the origin of eukaryotes. The puzzle is challenging due to the egalitarian nature of the transition where lower-level units took over energy metabolism. Contending theories widely disagree on ancestral partners, initial conditions and unfolding of events. There are many open questions but there is no comparative examination of hypotheses. We have specified twelve questions about the observable facts and hidden processes leading to the establishment of the endosymbiont that a valid hypothesis must address. We have objectively compared contending hypotheses under these questions to find the most plausible course of events and to draw insight on missing pieces of the puzzle. Since endosymbiosis borders evolution and ecology, and since a realistic theory has to comply with both domains’ constraints, the conclusion is that the most important aspect to clarify is the initial ecological relationship of partners. Metabolic benefits are largely irrelevant at this initial phase, where ecological costs could be more disruptive. There is no single theory capable of answering all questions indicating a severe lack of ecological considerations. A new theory, compliant with recent phylogenomic results, should adhere to these criteria. Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Michael W. Gray, William F. Martin and Purificación López-García.
机译:线粒体的起源是一个独特且艰巨的进化问题,它嵌入在真核生物的起源中。由于过渡的平等性质,这个难题是具有挑战性的,其中下级单位接管了能量代谢。争论的理论在祖先的伴侣,最初的条件和事件的发展上都存在分歧。有许多悬而未决的问题,但没有比较假设的检验。我们已经指定了十二个问题,这些问题涉及导致有效共生假说必须建立的共生共生体建立的可观察事实和隐藏过程。我们客观地比较了这些问题下的竞争假设,以找到最合理的事件过程,并从缺失的难题中获得见识。由于内共生关系到进化和生态的边界,并且由于现实的理论必须遵守这两个领域的约束,因此得出的结论是,最重要的方面是伙伴之间的初始生态关系。在此初始阶段,代谢益处与无关紧要,因为在此阶段,生态成本可能更具破坏性。没有单一的理论能够回答所有表明严重缺乏生态考虑的问题。符合最新系统生物学结果的新理论应遵循这些标准。审稿人:本文由Michael W. Gray,William F. Martin和PurificaciónLópez-García审阅。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号