首页> 外文期刊>Desalination and water treatment >Phosphorus removal of retrofit bioretention systems on urban surface runoff
【24h】

Phosphorus removal of retrofit bioretention systems on urban surface runoff

机译:城市地表径流改建生物保留系统的除磷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Bioretention systems rely on mixtures of soil, sand, and organic materials to manage stormwater runoff. However, bioretention systems can also leach nutrients, and the media has unstable effect in infiltration rates and downstream pollution loads. In this study, 10 bioretention basins were constructed by setting different configurations with modified media which a mixture of water treatment residual (WTR), green zeolite, fly ash, and coconut bran and traditional bioretention soil media (BSM, 65% sand+30% soil+5% sawdust, by mass), respectively. The steady infiltration rates of the modified packing bioretention systems were 3.25-62.78 times that of undisturbed soil, which was 0.24-3.3 times that of traditional bioretention soil. Results showed that the removal rate of total phosphorus in bioretention basin with coconut bran as modifier was lower than others (79.14%), and the removal rates of total phosphorus were 86.22%-96.87% in other systems. The effluent concentrations of total phosphorus in 10 bioretention systems were basically better than Class. limitation (0.3 mg/L) of Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water in China. The probabilities of BSM and fly ash mixed (#7), BSM and fly ash layered (#8), BSM and zeolite mixed (#9), and BSM and coconut bran mixed (#10) bioretention basins outflow concentration inferior to Class II limitation (0.1mg/L) were relatively high, which were 93%, 94%, 40%, and 91%, respectively. The total phosphorus load reduction rate decreased by approximately 20% for #1, and 15% for #7 bioretention basin, when the design recurrence interval increased from 0.5 to 3 years, or the contribution area ratio increased from 10 to 20. In 10 simulated rainfall experiments, the total phosphorus load reached 4.8 kg in each bioretention basin, and the total phosphorus load reduction rate reached 82.39% (#1)-98.32% (#3).
机译:生物保留系统依靠土壤,沙子和有机材料的混合物来管理雨水径流。但是,生物保留系统也可以浸出养分,并且介质对渗透率和下游污染负荷具有不稳定的影响。在这项研究中,通过设置不同的构造并使用改良的介质(包括水处理残留物(WTR),绿沸石,粉煤灰和椰子糠)和传统的生物滞留土壤介质(BSM,65%沙土+ 30%)的混合物,设置了10个生物滞留盆地。土壤+ 5%的木屑,按质量计)。改良填料生物滞留系统的稳定入渗速率是原状土壤的3.25-62.78倍,是传统生物滞留土壤的0.24-3.3倍。结果表明,以椰子糠为改性剂的生物滞留池中总磷的去除率较低(79.14%),其他系统中总磷的去除率为86.22%-96.87%。 10个生物保留系统中的总磷排放浓度基本上优于Class。中国地表水环境质量标准限量(0.3 mg / L)。 BSM和粉煤灰混合(#7),BSM和粉煤灰分层(#8),BSM和沸石混合(#9),BSM和椰子糠混合(#10)生物滞留池的概率低于II类限量(0.1mg / L)相对较高,分别为93%,94%,40%和91%。当设计重复间隔从0.5年增加到3年,或贡献面积比从10增加到20时,#1的总磷负荷降低率降低了,#7的生物保留池的总磷降低率降低了15%。在降雨实验中,每个生物滞留盆地的总磷负荷达到4.8 kg,总磷负荷降低率达到82.39%(#1)-98.32%(#3)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号