...
首页> 外文期刊>Desalination and water treatment >Fouling mitigation in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating dyeing and textile wastewater
【24h】

Fouling mitigation in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating dyeing and textile wastewater

机译:浸没式膜生物反应器处理印染和纺织品废水时的结垢缓解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The present study aims to assess the treatment efficiency and membrane fouling propensity of a submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating dyeing and textile wastewater by introducing Powder-Activated Carbon (PAC) and Alum (called "fouling reducer"). The treatment performance and fouling behavior of MBR when adding PAC and Alum were compared to those of the control MBR. The components of dyeing and textile wastewater were fluctuated with Chemical oxygen demand (COD), color, and turbidity of 500-2,500 mg/L, 370-2,700 Pt-Co, and 50-370 NTU, respectively. The Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) concentration in an MBR fluctuated from 6,000 to 9,000 mg/L. The mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) to MLSS ratio was 0.76. The organic loading rate was operated in the range of 1.4-1.7 kg COD/ m~3 d. In the control MBR (without the addition of a fouling reducer into the bioreactor), the results showed that the MBR could only remove the color at a maximum efficiency of 50% and COD of 60-94% during the operation time. The trans-membrane pressure (TMP) increased from 2.1 to 4.4 kPa during 30 days of operation. When PAC and Alum were introduced into the MBR at the concentrations of 1,000 and 40 mg/L_(sludge), respectively, the two compounds helped to enhance the removal efficiency of the COD, color, and fouling control. The treatment performance of the MBR and the fouling propensity were noticed to be much improved, compared to the control MBR. The efficiency to remove color was 40-80% and 80-90% for PAC and Alum, respectively. There is a significant difference in the COD removal efficiency between the addition of PAC and Alum. While the removal efficiency of COD removal ranged from 50 to 94% for PAC, it was stable at around 80-90% for Alum during the operation. Generally, the fouling mitigation of PAC and Alum was almost similar and even much effective compared to the control MBR. The TMP increased slowly from 2.2 to 2.9 kPa to 2.4 to -3.0 kPa in PAC and Alum in 22 days of operation. This fact reveals that Alum and PAC were excellent substances in fouling control, COD, and color removal for MBR treating the dyeing and textile wastewater.
机译:本研究旨在通过引入粉状活性炭(PAC)和明矾(称为“减污剂”)来评估浸没式膜生物反应器(MBR)处理印染和纺织废水的处理效率和膜污染倾向。将添加PAC和明矾时MBR的处理性能和结垢行为与对照MBR进行比较。印染和纺织废水的成分随化学需氧量(COD),颜色和浊度分别为500-2,500 mg / L,370-2,700 Pt-Co和50-370 NTU波动。 MBR中的混合液体悬浮固体(MLSS)浓度在6,000至9,000 mg / L之间波动。混合液挥发性悬浮固体(MLVSS)与MLSS之比为0.76。有机负载率在1.4-1.7 kg COD / m〜3 d范围内操作。在对照MBR中(不向生物反应器中添加污垢减少剂),结果显示MBR在操作期间只能以最大效率50%和COD 60-94%去除颜色。在运行30天期间,跨膜压力(TMP)从2.1 kPa增加到4.4 kPa。当分别以1,000和40 mg / L(污泥)的浓度将PAC和明矾引入MBR时,这两种化合物有助于提高COD的去除效率,颜色和结垢控制。与对照MBR相比,注意到MBR的处理性能和结垢倾向大大改善。 PAC和Alum的去色效率分别为40-80%和80-90%。添加PAC和明矾之间的COD去除效率存在显着差异。对于PAC,COD的去除效率为50%至94%,而在操作过程中,明矾的COD去除效率稳定在80-90%左右。通常,与对照MBR相比,PAC和Alum的结垢缓解几乎相似,甚至更为有效。在运行22天后,PAC和明矾中的TMP从2.2到2.9 kPa缓慢增加到2.4到-3.0 kPa。这一事实表明,明矾和PAC是用于MBR处理印染和纺织废水的结垢控制,COD和脱色方面的优良物质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号