首页> 外文期刊>Desalination and water treatment >Experiences from the Adelaide Desalination project: ultrafiltration cleaning optimisation-from pilot to full-scale operation
【24h】

Experiences from the Adelaide Desalination project: ultrafiltration cleaning optimisation-from pilot to full-scale operation

机译:阿德莱德海水淡化项目的经验:超滤清洁优化-从试验到全面运行

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Membrane fouling remains a major concern for ultrafiltration (UF) pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis (RO). The focus of this study was the optimisation of the chemical cleaning regime and any associated impact on the downstream cartridge filters (pre-RO). Different shock acidification/chlorination and maintenance wash (MW) regimes for the pilot UF were tested. The results of the study at the Adelaide Desalination Pilot Plant (ADPP) are summarised as follows: 1. Sulphuric acid shock dose alone at pH4 was ineffective for prevention of UF biogrowth, when performed for one hour per week or less. 2. Shock chlorination provided an effective tool for limiting biogrowth in UF systems. 3. Relocating the sodium metabisulphite dechlorination dosing point downstream of the cartridge filters was essential for controlling biogrowth and to ensure stable operation of the filters. 4. Chlorine MWs provided better UF permeability and transmembrane pressure (TMP) recovery than sulphuric acid MWs. 5. A chlorine MW frequency once in every 4 days and sulphuric acid MW frequency more than once in every 2 weeks was chosen for the full-scale plant. 6. Addition of ferric sulphate into the UF feed significantly impaired operational performance with respect to TMP and permeability decay rate. This is most likely due to the low seawater turbidity and dissolved organic carbon levels. Data from the ADPP were used to optimise operation conditions for the full-scale plant during commissioning. The Operator of the Adelaide Desalination Plant, AdelaideAqua Pty. Ltd. used the pilot plant findings to assist with optimisation of the dose/frequency regime for chlorine and sulphuric MWs. A comparison of pilot operation and full-scale plant commissioning performance is discussed.
机译:膜结垢仍然是海水反渗透(RO)超滤(UF)预处理的主要问题。这项研究的重点是优化化学清洗方案以及对下游滤筒过滤器(预RO)的任何相关影响。测试了试验超滤的不同冲击酸化/氯化和维持洗涤(MW)方案。在阿德莱德海水淡化试验工厂(ADPP)上的研究结果总结如下:1.当每周进行一小时或更短的时间时,仅在pH4的硫酸冲击剂量对预防超滤生物生长无效。 2.冲击氯化法为限制超滤系统中的生物生长提供了有效的工具。 3.将偏亚硫酸氢钠脱氯计量点重新安置在筒式过滤器的下游对于控制生物生长和确保过滤器的稳定运行至关重要。 4.氯MWs比硫酸MWs具有更好的UF渗透性和跨膜压力(TMP)回收率。 5.对于大型工厂,每4天选择一次氯MW频率,每2周一次选择一次硫酸MW频率。 6.在超滤进料中添加硫酸铁就TMP和渗透率衰减率而言显着损害了运行性能。这很可能是由于海水浊度低和有机碳溶解水平低所致。 ADPP的数据用于在调试期间优化大型工厂的运行条件。阿德莱德海水淡化厂的运营商,阿德莱德Aqua Pty.Ltd。利用试点工厂的发现来协助优化氯和硫酸MW的剂量/频率范围。讨论了试运行和全面工厂调试性能的比较。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Desalination and water treatment》 |2013年第3期|397-406|共10页
  • 作者单位

    South Australia Water Corporation, Chrysler Rd, Lonsdale, SA, Australia;

    Acciona Agua, Tratamiento de Aguas y Residuos, Calle Ramon Rubial 2, 48950 Erandio, Vizcaya, Spain;

    Acciona Agua, Tratamiento de Aguas y Residuos, Calle Ramon Rubial 2, 48950 Erandio, Vizcaya, Spain;

    South Australia Water Corporation, Chrysler Rd, Lonsdale, SA, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    ultrafiltration; fouling; biofouling;

    机译:超滤结垢生物污染;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号