首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Retrospective analysis on the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations
【24h】

Retrospective analysis on the repair vs. replacement of composite restorations

机译:修复与替换复合修复体的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. Our retrospective study aimed to assess the impact of repairs on the longevity of anterior and posterior direct composite restorations and to compare longevity of repaired and replacement restorations.Methods. Patient records were retrospectively screened for anterior and/or posterior composite restorations with 2+ surfaces placed in permanent teeth between 2000 and 2015. During follow-up, repaired and replaced restorations were assessed and mean annual failure rates (mAFR) calculated. Outcome was considered in three levels: Success (no further intervention), survival 1 (first repair = survival, second repair = failure) and survival 2 (more than one repair=survival, all surfaces repaired = failure). Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics, log-rank tests, and multi-variate Cox-regression analyses with shared frailty (p < 0.05).Results. 8542 initial restorations placed in 3239 patients were included (4.7 +/- 4.4 years followup, 2.5 +/- 0.7 surfaces). Longevity of initial restorations was prolonged by repair(s) (after 10 years: success: 68.3%, mAFR: 3.7%; survival 1: 77.3%, mAFR: 2.5%; survival 2: 80.4%, mAFR: 2.2%; p < 0.001). 616 repaired restorations (4.9 +/- 4.2 years follow-up, 3.5 +/- 1.0 surfaces) and 264 replacement restorations (5.6 +/- 4.1 years follow-up, 3.0 +/- 0.8 surfaces) were analyzed. Success of repaired restorations amounted to 43.4% after 10 years (mAFR: 8.0%), further repair(s) prolonged survival (survival 1: 65.7%, mAFR: 4.1%; survival 2: 74.8%, mAFR: 2.9%; p < 0.001). Success of replacement restorations amounted to 48.6% after 10 years (mAFR: 7.0%), repair(s) prolonged survival (survival 1: 67.4%, mAFR: 3.9%, p = 0.044; survival 2: 74.1%, mAFR: 3.0%, p = 0.003).Significance. Repairs are suitable to increase the survival of restorations; repaired restorations last as long as replacements. (C) 2019 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:目的。我们的回顾性研究旨在评估修复对前后直接复合修复的寿命的影响,并比较修复和置换修复的寿命。在2000年至2015年之间,对患者记录进行回顾性筛查,以筛查2个以上永久性牙齿表面放置的前和/或后复合修复体。在随访期间,评估修复和更换的修复体并计算平均年失败率(mAFR)。从三个级别考虑结果:成功(无进一步干预),生存1(第一次修复=生存,第二次修复=失败)和生存2(一次以上修复=生存,所有表面被修复=失败)。使用Kaplan-Meier统计量,对数秩检验和具有脆弱性的多变量Cox回归分析进行统计学分析(p <0.05)。包括3239例患者的8542例初始修复体(4.7 +/- 4.4年的随访,2.5 +/- 0.7的表面)。修复可延长初始修复的寿命(10年后:成功:68.3%,mAFR:3.7%;存活率1:77.3%,mAFR:2.5%;存活率2:80.4%,mAFR:2.2%; p < 0.001)。分析了616个修复的修复体(4.9 +/- 4.2年的随访时间,3.5 +/- 1.0个表面)和264个置换修复体(5.6 +/- 4.1年的随访时间,3.0 +/- 0.8个表面)。修复后10年的修复成功率为43.4%(mAFR:8.0%),进一步修复可延长生存期(生存期1:65.7%,mAFR:4.1%;生存期2:74.8%,mAFR:2.9%; p < 0.001)。十年后替换修复的成功率为48.6%(mAFR:7.0%),修复延长了生存期(生存期1:67.4%,mAFR:3.9%,p = 0.044;生存期2:74.1%,mAFR:3.0% ,p = 0.003)。修复适合增加修复体的存活率;修复后的修复物与替换物一样长。 (C)2019牙科材料学院。由Elsevier Inc.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号