首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Physicochemical and morphological characterization of a glass ceramic treated with different ceramic primers and post-silanization protocols
【24h】

Physicochemical and morphological characterization of a glass ceramic treated with different ceramic primers and post-silanization protocols

机译:用不同陶瓷底漆和后硅烷化方案处理的玻璃陶瓷的理化和形态表征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. Evaluate the effect of different ceramic primers and post-silanization protocols on physicochemical and morphological characteristics of a lithium disilicate glass ceramic.Methods. Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e-max CAD) plaques (6 x 10 x 2 mm) were divided into 3 groups according to the ceramic primer used: (1) Silane (RelyX Ceramic Primer-RL); (2) Silane + MDP (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus-CP); (3) Self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond Etch and Prime-MB). Specimens from each group were distributed into 5 sub-groups according to post-silanization protocols: (a) Treated as recommended by the manufacturer (MR), (b) MR + Additional drying with air at room temperature for 30 s (RTA), (c) MR + additional drying with hot air for 30 s (HT), (d) MR + Surface rinsing with water at room temperature for 10 s and drying with air at room temperature for 30 s (WT), and (e) Specimens were not silanized (NS). Surface free energy (SFE) was determined using static contact angles measurements with water and diiodomethane. SFE data were submitted to Friedman followed by Wilcoxon post-hoc test (alpha = 0.05). Morphology was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Elemental composition and chemical interactions were determined with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis.Results. RL presented the highest SFE (62.4 mN/m) followed by CP (59.7 mN/m). Post-silanization protocols resulted in similar SFE, but WT and HT induced the highest water contact angles when using CP and RL. CP modified ceramics' surface morphology compared to the etched and RL treated groups. The presence of water was identified on CP treated specimen. All analyzed primers formed siloxane bonds with ceramic surface.Significance. Ceramic primers resulted in different surface free energy and morphology, but siloxane bonds were identified for all tested solutions. HT and WT protocols should be used with RL and CP primers. MB was not influenced by the different silanization protocols. (C) 2019 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:目的。评估不同的陶瓷底漆和后硅烷化方案对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷的理化和形态特征的影响。根据使用的陶瓷底漆,将二硅酸锂陶瓷(IPS e-max CAD)板(6 x 10 x 2 mm)分为3组:(1)硅烷(RelyX Ceramic Primer-RL); (2)硅烷+ MDP(Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus-CP); (3)自蚀刻陶瓷底漆(Monobond Etch和Prime-MB)。根据后硅烷化方案,将每个组的样品分为5个子组:(a)按制造商(MR)的建议进行处理,(b)MR +在室温下用空气额外干燥30 s(RTA), (c)MR +用热空气额外干燥30 s(HT),(d)MR +室温下用水漂洗10 s,然后在室温下空气干燥30 s(WT),和(e)标本未硅烷化(NS)。使用与水和二碘甲烷的静态接触角测量值确定表面自由能(SFE)。将SFE数据提交给Friedman,然后进行Wilcoxon事后检验(alpha = 0.05)。使用扫描电子显微镜分析形态。通过X射线光电子能谱分析确定元素组成和化学相互作用。 RL表现出最高的SFE(62.4 mN / m),其次是CP(59.7 mN / m)。硅烷化后的方案产生了相似的SFE,但是当使用CP和RL时,WT和HT引起了最大的水接触角。与蚀刻和RL处理组相比,CP改性陶瓷的表面形态。经CP处理的样品上发现有水存在。所有分析的底漆都与陶瓷表面形成了硅氧烷键。陶瓷底漆产生不同的表面自由能和形貌,但在所有测试溶液中均发现了硅氧烷键。 HT和WT规程应与RL和CP引物一起使用。 MB不受不同的硅烷化方案的影响。 (C)2019牙科材料学院。由Elsevier Inc.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号