...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Influence of ceramic thickness and curing mode on the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dual-cured resin cements
【24h】

Influence of ceramic thickness and curing mode on the polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dual-cured resin cements

机译:陶瓷厚度和固化方式对双固化树脂水泥聚合收缩动力学的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess how ceramic disc thickness and curing mode (light or chemical) affects the polymerization shrinkage of dual-cured resin cements and to evaluate the effect of the ceramic discs on the curing speed of the cements during light exposure. Methods. Six commercial resin cements, RelyX ARC, Bistite II, Duolink, Panavia F, Variolink II and Choice were used. Filler weight contents were determined by the ash method. Four ceramic discs with thicknesses of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4mm, respectively, were made. The attenuation of light intensity due to the ceramic discs was measured using a radiometer. The polymerization shrinkage kinetics of the resin cements by chemical or light cure through the different ceramic discs was measured using a bonded-disc method. Results. There were differences in filler content among brands of resin cement. The polymerization shrinkage without ceramic disc was 2.611.59% by chemical cure and 2.93-4.66% by light cure. The polymerization shrinkage of RelyX ARC and Panavia F by chemical cure was statistically lower than by light cure (p<0.05). Polymerization shrinkage and filler weight were inversely related (R= -0.965). Both the transmitted light intensity and polymerization shrinkage decreased with increasing thickness of ceramic discs (p<0.05). The time to reach the maximum shrinkage rate of the resin cements increased with increasing ceramic thickness. The cure speed by light cure was 15-322 times faster than by chemical cure. Significance. The polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dual-cured resin cements significantly differed between brands under various curing conditions. Clinicians should be aware of the setting characteristics of the cements, so they can choose the optimal materials for different clinical situations.
机译:目标。这项研究的目的是评估陶瓷盘的厚度和固化方式(光或化学方式)如何影响双固化树脂水泥的聚合收缩率,并评估陶瓷盘在曝光过程中对水泥固化速度的影响。方法。使用了六种市售树脂水泥,分别是RelyX ARC,Bistite II,Duolink,Panavia F,Variolink II和Choice。填料重量含量通过灰分法确定。制作了四个厚度分别为0.5、1、2和4mm的陶瓷盘。使用辐射计测量由于陶瓷盘引起的光强度衰减。使用粘结盘法测量通过化学或光固化通过不同陶瓷盘的树脂胶泥的聚合收缩动力学。结果。树脂水泥品牌之间的填料含量存在差异。没有陶瓷盘的聚合收缩率通过化学固化为2.611.59%,通过光固化为2.93-4.66%。从统计学上讲,RelyX ARC和Panavia F的聚合收缩率在统计学上低于光固化(p <0.05)。聚合收缩率和填料重量成反比(R = -0.965)。随着陶瓷盘厚度的增加,透射光强度和聚合收缩率均降低(p <0.05)。随着陶瓷厚度的增加,达到树脂胶泥最大收缩率的时间也增加了。光固化的固化速度比化学固化快15-322倍。意义。在各种固化条件下,不同品牌的双固化树脂水泥的聚合收缩动力学存在显着差异。临床医生应了解水泥的凝结特性,因此他们可以针对不同的临床情况选择最佳材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号