首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Fatigue limits of enamel bonds with moist and dry techniques
【24h】

Fatigue limits of enamel bonds with moist and dry techniques

机译:湿法和干法的瓷釉粘结疲劳极限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. Shear fatigue limit (SFL) testing, coupled with shear bond strength (SBS) measurements can provide valuable information regarding the ability of adhesive systems to bond to mineralized tooth structures. The clinical technique for enamel bonding with adhesive resins has shifted from bonding to a thoroughly dried acid conditioned surface to a moist surface to facilitate dentin bonding. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of ethanol-containing etch-and-rinse adhesive (ERA) systems on moist and dry enamel by determining the resin composite to enamel SBS and SFL, and examining the relationship of SBS and SFL.rnMethods. Twelve specimens each were used to determine 24-h resin composite (Z100 - 3M ESPE) to enamel SBS to moist and dry surfaces with two ERA systems, Adper Single Bond Plus (SBP) and OptiBond Solo Plus (OBP). A staircase method of fatigue testing was used in a four-station fatigue cycler to determine the SFL of resin composite to enamel bonds (moist and dry) with the two ERA systems (20 specimens for each test condition) at 0.25 Hz for 40,000 cycles. ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were used for the SBS data and a modified t-test with Bonferroni correction was used for comparisons of SFL.rnResults. The two ERA systems each generated statistically similar SBS (p>0.05) to moist and dry enamel and the SBS of SBP was significantly higher than OBP on dry enamel (p < 0.05). The SFL of SBP was significantly greater to dry enamel when compared to moist enamel and there was not a significant difference in the SFL of OBP on dry and moist enamel. There were no significant differences in SFL values between SBP on either moist or dry enamel and OBP on both moist and dry enamel.rnSignificance. Fatigue testing may provide more useful information than SBS tests regarding the performance of dental adhesive systems. The chemical composition, solvents and filler components of ERA systems may influence their ability to develop long-term durable bonds to both moist and dry enamel surfaces.
机译:目的。剪切疲劳极限(SFL)测试以及剪切粘结强度(SBS)测量可以提供有关胶粘剂系统粘结到矿化牙齿结构的能力的有价值的信息。用粘合剂树脂进行牙釉质粘合的临床技术已经从粘合到彻底干燥的经酸处理的表面转变为湿润的表面,以促进牙本质粘合。本研究的目的是通过确定与搪瓷SBS和SFL形成的树脂复合材料,并检验SBS和SFL的关系,比较含乙醇的蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂(ERA)系统在湿和干搪瓷上的性能。 。使用两个ERA系统(Adper Single Bond Plus(SBP)和OptiBond Solo Plus(OBP))将十二个样品分别用于测定24-h树脂复合材料(Z100-3M ESPE),以在潮湿和干燥的表面上搪瓷SBS。在四工位疲劳循环仪中采用阶梯试验疲劳测试方法,以0.25 Hz的两个ERA系统(每个测试条件20个样品)在40,000个循环中测定树脂复合材料与牙釉质结合(湿润和干燥)的SFL。 SBS数据使用ANOVA和Tukey的事后检验,Bonferroni校正的改良t检验用于SFL的比较。两个ERA系统各自在统计上都类似于湿釉和干釉的SBS(p> 0.05),并且SBP的SBS显着高于干釉的OBP(p <0.05)。与湿釉相比,SBP的SFL对干釉的影响显着更大,而在干和湿釉上的OBP的SFL没有显着差异。在湿或干瓷釉上的SBP与湿和干瓷釉上的OBP之间的SFL值均无显着差异。与SBS测试相比,疲劳测试可以提供更多有关牙科胶粘剂系统性能的有用信息。 ERA系统的化学成分,溶剂和填充剂成分可能会影响其在湿性和干性搪瓷表面上形成长期持久粘合的能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dental materials》 |2009年第12期|1527-1531|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University School of Dentistry, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA;

    Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University School of Dentistry, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA;

    Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University School of Dentistry, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    dental materials; enamel; adhesion; bond strength; fatigue;

    机译:牙科材料;搪瓷;附着力粘结强度;疲劳;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号