首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Determination of the optimal photoinitiator concentration in dental composites based on essential material properties
【24h】

Determination of the optimal photoinitiator concentration in dental composites based on essential material properties

机译:基于基本材料性能确定牙科复合材料中最佳光引发剂浓度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine the concentrations of the photosensi-tizer (camphoroquinone, CQ) and coinitiator (ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate, EDMAB) that resulted in maximum conversion but generated minimum contraction stress in experimental composites.rnMethods. Experimental composites were prepared with an identical resin formulation [TEGDMA:UDMA:bis-GMA of 30.25:33.65:33.65]. Five groups of resin were prepared at varied CQ concentrations (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1.6 wt% of the resin). Five subgroups of resin were prepared at each level of CQ concentration, by adding EDMAB at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 wt% of the resin, resulting in 25 experimental resins. Finally, strontium glass (~3μm) and silica (0.04 μm) were added at 71.5 and 12.6 wt% of the composite, respectively. Samples (n = 3) were then evaluated for Knoop hardness (KHN), degree of conversion (DC), depth of cure (DoC) and contraction stress (CS).rnResults. There was an optimal CQ and EDMAB concentration that resulted in maximum DC and KHN, beyond which increased concentration resulted in a decline in those properties. KHN testing identified two regions of maxima with best overlaps occurring at CQ:EDMAB ratio of 1.44:0.42 and 1.05:1.65 mol%. DC evaluation showed one region of maximum, the best overlap occurring at CQ:EDMAB ratio of 2.40:0.83 mol%. DoC was 4 mm. Overall, maximum CS was attained before the system reached the maximum possible conversion and hardness. Significance. (1) Selection of optimal photoinitiator/amine concentration is critical to materials' formulation, for excessive amounts can compromise materials' properties. (2) There was no sufficient evidence to suggest that contraction stress can be reduced by lowering CQ/EDMAB concentration without compromising DC and KHN.
机译:目标。这项研究的目的是确定光敏剂(樟脑醌,CQ)和共引发剂(-4-二甲基氨基苯甲酸乙酯,EDMAB)的浓度,该浓度在实验复合材料中产生最大的转化率,但产生最小的收缩应力。用相同的树脂配方[TEGDMA:UDMA:bis-GMA为30.25:33.65:33.65]制备实验复合材料。在不同的CQ浓度下制备了五组树脂(分别占树脂的0.1、0.2、0.4、0.8和1.6重量%)。通过在树脂的0.05、0.1、0.2、0.4和0.8 wt%处添加EDMAB,在每个CQ浓度水平下制备了五个树脂亚组,得到25种实验树脂。最后,分别加入锶玻璃(〜3μm)和二氧化硅(0.04μm),分别占复合材料的71.5和12.6 wt%。然后评估样品(n = 3)的努氏硬度(KHN),转化度(DC),固化深度(DoC)和收缩应力(CS)。最佳的CQ和EDMAB浓度会导致最大的DC和KHN,超过此浓度会导致这些性能下降。 KHN测试确定了在CQ:EDMAB比为1.44:0.42和1.05:1.65 mol%时出现最大重叠的两个最大区域。 DC评估显示最大的一个区域,在2.40:0.83 mol%的CQ:EDMAB比率下出现最佳重叠。 DoC为4毫米。总体而言,在系统达到最大可能的转化率和硬度之前,已达到最大CS值。意义。 (1)选择最佳的光引发剂/胺浓度对于材料的配方至关重要,因为过量的用量会损害材料的性能。 (2)没有足够的证据表明通过降低CQ / EDMAB浓度可以降低收缩压力而不会损害DC和KHN。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dental materials》 |2009年第8期|994-1000|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Cranial Facial Biology, School of Dentistry, Uniuersity of Colorado, Mail Stop 8120,RC1-S, Rm P18 2103, 12801 E. 17th Ave., P.O. Box 6511, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;

    Division of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Heath & Science Uniuersity,611 SW Campus Dr, Portland, OR 97239, USA;

    Division of Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Heath & Science Uniuersity,611 SW Campus Dr, Portland, OR 97239, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    photosensitizer; coinitiator; degree of conversion; depth of cure; contraction stress; knoop hardness;

    机译:光敏剂共同发起人转换程度;治愈深度;收缩压力努氏硬度;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:47:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号